Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Wheel Thrown Pottery rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Wheel Thrown Pottery
Wheel Thrown Pottery
Students and teacher will evaluate their pottery piece based on their experience on the wheel and the outcome of their completed pot. Circle how your feel you did and give a brief explanation in the comments box and or on the back.
Rubric Code:
S23W3AB
By
AnnScott
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Wheel Thrown pots
Excellent
4 pts
Good+
3 pts
Average/ beginner
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
score/ Comments
(N/A)
Craftsmanship
Excellent
Pot is Stable, Symmetrical, Centered, Level and Trimmed properly. The walls are of a uniform 1/4 thickness and pot is of good weigh and volume. Shaping has been used with a specific design evident.
Good+
Pot is stable, Pot is very close to level, Walls are mostly even. Pot is a good weight and volume. Clay is properly wedged; project does not blow up in the kiln but has cracks
Average/ beginner
Pot is close to being stable. Pot is getting closer to level. The walls are uneven, but making progress. Pot is slightly too heavy - may not fire
Needs Improvement
Pot is not stable.
Pot is not level. Pot walls are uneven. The form is random. The pot is too heavy to fire.
score/ Comments
Form and finish
Excellent
The lip is even and perfectly smoothed. and the form is purposeful, balanced and pleasing.The foot is smooth and finished. There is an interesting alteration of the form. Underglazes/Glazes are used properly and not put on too thin or too thick; no chipping or streaking evident. Fingerprints and tool marks are removed from surface of sculpture before it is completed. Three 6” pieces or 5 smaller than 6”
Good+
The lip is even and purposely smoothed.
The walls of the pot have a nice form, and are free of most unwanted blemishes and interesting alterations. The foot is trimmed well. Underglazes/Glazes are good some too thin or too thick areas ; a little chipping or streaking evident. Fingerprints and tool marks are mostly removed from surface of sculpture. before it is completed. Two 6” pieces or 3-4 smaller than 6”
Average/ beginner
The lip is mostly even and has been cleaned up with only a few blemishes on the lip or walls. The form is not purposeful. The foot is poorly trimmed. Underglazes/Glazes are ok mostly too thin or too thick areas ; chipping or streaking evident. Fingerprints and unnecessary tool marks are mostly removed from surface of sculpture before it is completed. One 6” piece or 2-3 smaller than 6”
Needs Improvement
The lip is uneven and has rough edges. the walls are too thick or uneven. Lip and walls are sloppy. There is no trimmed foot on the pot.Underglazes/Glazes are ok mostly too thin or too thick areas ; chipping or streaking evident. Fingerprints and unnecessary tool marks are not removed from surface of sculpture before it is completed. One unfinished 6” piece or 2 unfinished smaller than 6”
score/ Comments
Studio Maintenance
Excellent
Student showed significant consideration and effort in cleaning classroom materials and tools everyday, helping wedge out clay often and supporting their peers in the wheelworking process.
Good+
Student showed marked consideration and effort in cleaning classroom materials and tools and in supporting their peers in the wheel working process.
Average/ beginner
Student showed some consideration for cleaning up tools and materials and maintaining classroom space and supporting environment.
Needs Improvement
Student did minimum if any cleaning. Student did not show any support for peers.
score/ Comments
Experimenation
Excellent
Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student gave undivided attention during the demonstration. Student did ask questions to clear misunderstandings.
Good+
Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student paid attention during the demonstration. Student did ask questions to clear misunderstandings.
Average/ beginner
Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student should pay more attention during the demonstration. Student did ask questions to clear misunderstandings.
Needs Improvement
Student is unwilling to learn new ideas and processes. Student ignored requests to pay attention while the project was being demonstrated.
Student did not ask any questions to clear any misunderstandings.
score/ Comments
Keywords:
wheel pottry
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Project
Assignment
Class note
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.