- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Peer Review Grading Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Peer Review Grading Rubric use to evaluate the Research Project Outline Rubric Code: S22W32 By tihelatiyah Draft Private Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

grading rubric percentage scoring
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
content and development 50 %	Poor incomplete content and thesis statement, unclear and unpersuasive incoherent	Fair thesis statement unfocused,content not comprehensive enough or persuasive, does not delve into subject with enough depth major points are considered but not supported and does not address concepts,content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought	Good Focused thesis statement, content comprehensive with adequate research and supports, uses transitional words to move the reading forward,major points are stated clearly and are well supported. Research is adequate, timely and adddresses course concepts content and purpose of the writing are clear.
organization & structure 20 %	Poor organization and structure detract from the message of the writer. Introduction or conclusion is missing. paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.	Fair uneasy structure introduction is lacking major points. paragraph transitions need improving. conclusion does not flow from the body of the paper.	Good structure of paper is clear and easy to follow intro provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points paragraph transitions are logical and maintian the flow of thought throughtout the paper. Conclusion is logical and flows fromthe body of the paper. uses transitional words to move the reading forward
format 10 %	Poor lacks elements of correct formatting. citations and references are not provided. Paper is inadequate/excessive in length.	Fair follows most guidelines. has incorrectly prepared citations. Paper has reference list with some errors or omissions. paper is too short or too long	Good paper follows designated guidelines. citations and references are used appropriately. paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
grammar, punctuation & spelling 20 %	Poor paper contains numerous grammatical punctuation and spelling errors-language uses jargon or conversational tone	Fair contains a few grammatical errors, punctuation and spelling errors, uses some jargon or conversational tone.	Good rules of grammar, usuage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is clear, succinct, concise and precise, sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.