Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Research Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Research Project
MULTIMEDIA PROJECT 1
Students will create a multimedia project of choice (PowerPoint;tri-fold poster; etc) on a topic of their choice related to their research on 16th/17th Century England.
Rubric Code:
RXAW869
By
leimcnn
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
MULTIMEDIA PROJECT
EXEMPLARY
4 pts
PROFICIENT
3 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
2 pts
POOR
1 pts
NOT DONE
0 pts
CONTENT RELATED
EXEMPLARY
Student creates an original, accurate and interesting project that adequately addresses the chosen topic.
PROFICIENT
Student creates an accurate project that adequately addresses the chosen topic.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Student creates a somewhat accurate project but it does not adequately address the chosen topic.
POOR
The project is not accurate.
NOT DONE
RESEARCH
EXEMPLARY
Student's interpretation of research notes and ideas are relevant to topic and are in student's own words.
PROFICIENT
Most of student's interpretation of research notes and ideas are relevant to topic and are in student's own words.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Student's interpretation of research notes and ideas are not always relevant to topic and most notes are directly copied from sources.
POOR
Notes and ideas are not relevant to topic and may be copied directly from sources.
NOT DONE
PLANNING
EXEMPLARY
A well-defined, structured and effective plan was formulated through a storyboard, thumbnails, or rough script. The presentation followed the plan.
PROFICIENT
A structured plan was formulated through a through a storyboard, thumbnails, or rough script. The presentation shows that many of the elements of the plan were followed.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
A plan was formulated through a storyboard, thumbnails, or rough script, but it was somewhat lacking in organization and structure. The presentation does not always follow the plan.
POOR
A plan was formulated through a storyboard, thumbnails, or rough script, but it shows little or no planning. The presentation shows no organization and lacks any elements of the plan.
NOT DONE
TECHNICAL PRODUCTION
EXEMPLARY
Images/Ideas flow smoothly and convey the topic of the research. All elements are clear and and easily understood by an audience.
PROFICIENT
Nearly all images/ideas flow smoothly and convey the thesis of the presentation. Most elements are clear and and easily understood by an audience.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Images/Ideas flow inconsistently and do not always convey the thesis of the research. Some elements are not clear or and easily understood by an audience.
POOR
Images/Ideas rarely flow smoothly and rarely convey the thesis of the presentation.<BR>
Many elements are not clear or easily understood by an audience.
NOT DONE
CREATIVITY
EXEMPLARY
The student demonsrates<BR>
excellent creative<BR>
thinking and excellent effort.
PROFICIENT
The student demonstrates<BR>
well-developed creative thinking and <BR>
effort.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
The student <BR>
demonstrates<BR>
little creative thinking and little effort.
POOR
The student <BR>
demonstrates no<BR>
creative thinking and little to no effort.
NOT DONE
PRESENTATION
EXEMPLARY
The student consistently made eye-contact with the audience. Speech was free of "filler phrases". They did not read off of the presentation. They spoke loudly and clearly for all to hear.
PROFICIENT
The student occasionally made eye-contact with the audience. Speech was mostly free of "filler phrases". They did not read off of the presentation. They spoke loudly and clearly for all to hear.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
The student seldom made eye-contact with the audience. Speech contained multiple "filler phrases". They occasionally read from presentation. They had difficulty speaking loud and clear.
POOR
The student rarely made eye-contact with the audience. Speech contained an egregious amount of "filler phrases". They consistently read from presentation. They had difficulty speaking loud and clear.
NOT DONE
FINAL PRODUCT
EXEMPLARY
Final product is neat, professional looking with excellent attention to detail and careful execution. Ready for an audience beyond the classroom.
PROFICIENT
Final product is neat, with excellent attention to detail and careful execution. May have some execution errors that do not detract from overall design. Ready for an audience beyond the classroom.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Final product is not neat, with lack of attention to detail and execution. May have some execution errors that detract from overall design. Not ready for an audience beyond the classroom.
POOR
Final product is not neat, with extremely poor attention to detail and execution. Contains numerous execution errors that detract and interfere with overall design. Not ready for an audience beyond the classroom.
NOT DONE
MEETS DEADLINE
EXEMPLARY
Deadline met.
PROFICIENT
Missed deadline by one day.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Missed deadline by 2 days
POOR
Missed deadline by 3 days.
NOT DONE
Missed deadline by more than three days.
Subjects:
English
Science
Types:
Project
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.