Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Science Fair Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Science Fair Project
Science Fair Project
Rubric Code:
RXA6XC4
By
celstar
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5, 6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project Points
Excellent
5 pts
Very Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Problem Statement
Excellent
Question/Topic is original, specific, measurable, and realistic.
Very Good
Question/Topic is specific, measurable, and realistic.
Fair
Question/Topic is semi-specific, measurable, and realistic.
Poor
Question/Topic is broad and/or unrealistic. Student seems to be confused about purpose of project.
Hypothesis
Excellent
Hypothesis is testable and directly relates to the purpose. Reasons are given for making this hypothesis.
Very Good
Hypothesis is testable, directly relates to the purpose.
Fair
Hypothesis correlates to the purpose, but is difficult to test.
Poor
Hypothesis does not answer the research question and is not testable.
Materials and Procedure
Excellent
ALL required materials are listed. Steps are logical and thorough, easily followed.
Very Good
Student included all items required. Steps are logical and thorough, easily followed, but one step may be missing or confusing.
Fair
Student included most items required. Steps are logical, but somewhat confusing.
Poor
Student did not list all necessary items, or use appropriate materials. Steps are not detailed or logical, and/or missing. It would be extremely difficult to follow or duplicate this experiment.
Observations
Excellent
Observations are recorded and explained using vivid details and scientific language. Student shows an understanding of process their project took.
Very Good
Observations are recorded and explained using vivid details and scientific language.
Fair
Observations are recorded but may be confusing.
Poor
Observations are not included.
Data Table /Graph
Excellent
Results are easily interpreted and are represented in at graph or table format.
Or results are photographed clearly and chronologically
More than one trial
Very Good
Results are represented in at graph or table format. But may be difficult to understand.
Results are photographed or written up. More than one trial
Fair
Results are represented in at graph or table format. But not labeled and or complete.
Results are written but are not clear or chronological.
One trial
Poor
No Graph or table included
No information or information that does not explain result
Conclusion
Excellent
Conclusion retells the hypothesis, answers the question/problem, gives proof of the answer with some of the data results, and tells what they learned using scientific terms.
Very Good
Conclusion includes all but 1 of the following: retells the hypothesis, answers the question/problem, gives proof of the answer with some of the data results, and tells what they learned using scientific terms.
Fair
Conclusion includes all but 2 of the following: retells the hypothesis, answers the question/problem, gives proof of the answer with some of the data results, and tells what they learned using scientific terms.
Poor
Conclusion is confusing and/or does not answer the research question. Student does not attempt to explain if hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Display Board/Graphics
Excellent
Display shows an obvious attention to detail and is decorated neatly. All steps of the Scientific process show a logical order. Student provided appropriate graphics.
Very Good
Display shows some attention to detail and is neatly decorated. Most steps show a logical order. At least one appropriate graphic was used.
Fair
Display is decorated moderately neat. Parts of the Scientific process may be out of order or confusing. Graphics may or may not have been included.
Poor
Display is not neat and/or seems haphazardly thrown together. Steps of the Scientific process do not show a logical order. Appropriate graphics were not provided.
Presentation
Excellent
Students able to answer questions and fully explain each aspect of the experiment in a clear concise manner
Very Good
Students able to answer mostquestions posed about experiment.
Fair
Students unable to answer questions posed outside of what is written on the display board.
Poor
Students unable to answer questions without directly reading from written work.
Keywords:
science fair
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.