Skip to main content

iRubric: World History Research Paper rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
World History Research Paper 
Rubric Code: RX75AXA
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric World History Research Paper
  Superb

4 pts

Excellent

3 pts

Good

2 pts

Fair

1 pts

Poor

0 pts

Introduction

Superb

Has a clear, strong thesis, introduces the topic, gives historical background, and it introduces the points to be made in the paper
Excellent

Has a clear thesis statement, introduces the topic, gives historical background but does not introduce the points to be made in the paper
Good

Has a thesis statement, introduces the topic, and gives some historical background, but does not address the points to be made in the paper
Fair

Has a thesis statement, but its introduction of the topic is weak and does not address the points to be made in the paper
Poor

There is no thesis statement, does it introduce the topic, does not address the points to be made in the paper
Using historically accurate informa

Superb

All historical information is accurate, shows great research, does not rely on general historical knowledge, shows understanding of historical events
Excellent

All historical information is true and correct, and does not rely on general information of historical events
Good

Historical information shows research; most historical data is accurate, though some important details are not
Fair

Historical information is limited to general knowledge only; historical information is somewhat accurate but many details are not correct, no evidence of research
Poor

Historical information is not accurate, historical information is limited only to general knowledge, there is no evidence of research
Historical Analysis

Superb

Shows an an excellent understanding of historical analysis, demonstrates a keen understanding of how the historical events relate to the topic, shows superb analytical skill of historical facts
Excellent

Shows an excellent understanding of historical analysis, shows an understanding of historical significance to the topic
Good

Shows a basic analysis of historical analysis, shows basic understanding of historical significance to the topic
Fair

Has limited historical analysis, shows limited recognition of historical significance to topic
Poor

Does not demonstrate understanding of historical analysis, does not show recognition of historical significance
Support of Evidence

Superb

Evidence shows a clear understanding of the historical analysis and always supports the thesis
Excellent

Evidence clearly supports historical analysis and supports the thesis
Good

Evidence supports historical analysis and frequently supports thesis
Fair

Some evidence supports historical analysis and sometimes supports the thesis
Poor

Evidence does not support historical analysis nor does it support the thesis
Citation

Superb

When giving historical information beyond what is general knowledge, cites all sources and all sources are formatted correctly
Excellent

When giving historical information beyond what is general knowledge, cites most sources, but all cited sources are formatted correctly
Good

When giving historical information beyond what is general knowledge, cites only a few sources but they are formatted correctly; OR all sources are cited, but they are not formatted correctly
Fair

When giving historical information beyond what is general knowledge, cites only a few sources
Poor

When giving historical information beyond what is general knowledge, does not cite any sources
Works Cited Page

Superb

Has at least five sources, three of which are primary, two of which are secondary, all sources are formatted correctly, has no reference from a non-academic source
Excellent

Has at least five sources, three of them are primary and two of them are secondary, but they are not formatted correctly; OR Has at least three primary sources, and two secondary but one or more of the references are from a non-academic source
Good

Has at least five sources, but does not have three primary sources, sources are mostly formatted correctly
Fair

Has at least five sources but only one is a primary source, none or only a few of the sources are formatted correctly, one or more of the sources are from a non-academic reference
Poor

Has five sources but none are primary, three or more of the cited resources are not from an academic reference and none of them are primary sources, none of the cited sources are formatted correctly










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178