Skip to main content

iRubric: Sport Management Debates rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Sport Management Debates Sport Management Internship Assessment rubric for graduate students' projects of class debates on current problems and issues in sport management Rubric Code: RX6632 By eatkinson Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Physical Ed., Fitness Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Graduate

Sport Management Debates
	Excellent 4 pts	Very Good 3 pts	Average 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Unacceptable 0 pts
Debate Topic/ Preparation/ Research	Excellent Debate topic selection, preparation, research were excellently displayed	Very Good Debate topic selection, preparation, research were very evident	Average Debate topic selection, preparation, research were average and met standards	Poor Debate topic selection, preparation, or research were at the beginning level	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Appearance/ Poise	Excellent Appearance and poise were excellent and displayed extreme confidence	Very Good Appearance and poise were professional	Average Appearance and poise were average and met standard norms	Poor Appearance not professional and presenter not poised	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Introduction/ Purpose	Excellent Introduction and purpose were excellently executed	Very Good Introduction and purpose were very well executed	Average Introduction and purpose were average and met standard norms	Poor Introduction and purpose were at beginning level of performance	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Strategy/ Pt-Ctpoint/Crit. Thinking	Excellent Debate strategy and point - counterpoint format, critical thinking were execellently demonstrated	Very Good Debate strategy and point - counterpoint format, critical thinking were very good	Average Debate strategy and point - counterpoint format, critical thinking were average and met standards	Poor Debate strategy, point - counter-point format, critical thinking were at beginning level	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Knowledge/ Content	Excellent Knowledge and content were brillantly relayed and extremely evident	Very Good Demonstrated very good mastery of knowledge and content	Average Knowledge and content were average and met standard norms	Poor Knowledge and content at beginning level	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of Univ. Acad. Integrity Policy
Presentation/ Delivery Style	Excellent Presentation and delivery excellent with superb eye contact, voice projection and confident posture	Very Good Eye contact, voice projection and posture in presentation were very good	Average Presentation and delivery were average and met standard norms	Poor Poor eye contact, voice projection or posture in presentation	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Creativity (Visual Aids & Handouts	Excellent Use of aids was extremely creative and demonstrated with technology	Very Good Use of aids kept interest of audience and was very well executed	Average Creativity in debate was average and met standard norms	Poor Lacks creativity	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Organization/ Flow/ Time	Excellent Organizational skills were exceptional and the flow of the debate and time execution were excellent	Very Good Organizational skills, flow of debate and time utilization were very good	Average Debate and presentation organization, flow, or time utilization were average and met standard norms	Poor Debate and presentation were poorly organized, confusing or did not utilize time well	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Finish/ Conclusions/ Recomendations	Excellent Finish, conclusions, or recommendations were excellent and superbly executed	Very Good Finish, conclusions, or recomendations were greatly evident and very good	Average Finish, conclusions, or recomendations were average and met standard norms	Poor Finish, conclusions, or recommendations were at begining level	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy
Assignment Execution	Excellent Assignment execution was excellent	Very Good Assignemnt was very well executed	Average Assignemnt was executed on the average level and met standard norms	Poor Assignment performance was executed at beginning level	Unacceptable No assignment completed or violation of University Academic Integrity Policy

Keywords:

Debate, sport managment, issues, problems, project

Subjects:

Physical Ed., Fitness

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Physical Ed., Fitness rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202