iRubric: Alice - Final Programming Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Alice - Final Programming Project Alice - Final Programming Project Alice Final Project - 150 points (10 points extra credit available) Rubric Code: RX49B23 By dsherrer Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Computers Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Programming
	Poor 3 pts	Fair 5 pts	Good 7 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Design
Story	Poor Random movements, no coherent story.	Fair Hard to understand, but a semblance of a story; more just an excuse to randomly use methods.	Good An easy to understand story, with methods to fit the story and not the other way around.	Excellent Exceeds Expectations. Story is creative with well-defined beginning, middle and ending.
Opening Video and Title Page	Poor Game does not have opening video or title page.	Fair Game has opening video or title page.	Good Game has opening video and title page.	Excellent Game has opening video and title page . Title page has buttons for instructions, run, and quit.
Objects (1-2+)	Poor Has used too few or too many objects(1).	Fair Has used several objects(2), some not used however.	Good Has used an appropriate amount of objects (2) to create the story.	Excellent Exceeds Expectations. Objects (2+) utilized effectively to drive story and programming.
Methods (Range 1-20+)	Poor Only a few methods(1-5) used and not in any correct order.	Fair Several different types of methods(5-10) used; varying degree of order.	Good Many different types of methods(10-15) used in good order, including superclass methods.	Excellent Exceeds Expectations (15-20). Methods utilized effectively to develop story-action and organize programming. Game makes use of programmer designed methods, including superclass methods.
Documentation.	Poor No comments documenting understanding of code and author of the code.	Fair Comments used sparingly.	Good Comments used regularly documenting programming author or understanding.	Excellent Comments used consistently documenting both understanding and programming author.
Implementation
Do-In Order	Poor No Do-In Order	Fair Do-In Order used but in a very simplistic manner (no reason other than to put it in).	Good Do-In Order used to make some things happen in a logical order.	Excellent Exceeds Expectations. Do-In Order used to make many things happen in a logical order.
Do-Together	Poor No Do-Together	Fair Do-Together used but in a very simplistic manner.	Good Do-Together used in order to help create a more complex method.	Excellent Exceeds Expectations. Do togethers are utilized to develop programming organization and flow.
Randomness	Poor Game has not randomness.	Fair Game has randomness but can not be noticed in play.	Good Randomness gives variation to game play.	Excellent Variables are used in randomness changes difficulty as play improves.
Advanced
User control.	Poor Game has no key control or user entering data.	Fair Game has key control or user entering data.	Good Game has multiple key controls and user entering data.	Excellent Game responds to user Events and user data, like key press or mouse clicks, arrow keys (at least 4 different events). There are multiple uses of key controls running a method such as jump.
Control Statements	Poor No control statements.	Fair Game has a if-else statement or a while loop statement.	Good Game has both if-else and while loops.	Excellent Game makes uses of many if-else and while loops.
Variables (Range 3-5+)	Poor Only a few variables used and not in any logical order.	Fair Variables are used in statements or as a property in methods.	Good Variables are used in statements and as a property in methods.	Excellent Variables are used in statements and as a property in methods. Variables are used in parameters passed through methods.
Functions and Expressions	Poor No Functions or Expressions.	Fair Game has a function or an expression.	Good Game has both functions and expressions.	Excellent Game makes use of many functions and expressions.
Testing and Debugging
Character Animation	Poor Characters move little, if at all.	Fair Characters are present, move somewhat.	Good Character movements are somewhat realistic, but still choppy.	Excellent Character movements are realistic.
Animation Timing	Poor Minimal seconds-poor story and program development. (20 seconds or below)	Fair Average seconds-adequate story and program development. (25 seconds minimum (+/- 5 seconds))	Good Above-Average seconds-better story and program development. (45 seconds minimum (+/- 5 seconds)	Excellent Exceeds Expectations- seconds-excellent story and program development. (60 seconds minimum (+/- 10 seconds)
Creativity	Poor No creative elements are used. Basic characters are the only objects presented.	Fair Some creative elements are present	Good Many creative elements are present, and add to the atmosphere of the game	Excellent Wow! many creative elements are present that makes this a fun game to play!
Effort	Poor Student failed to follow directions. The project was not thought through. Work showed little or no effort. Work was not finished or completed correctly.	Fair Student followed some of the directions. Project was completed, but needed improvements. More effort was needed to have a better finished project.	Good Student followed most of the directions. Project was completed very well. Student worked hard and created a good finished project	Excellent Student followed all directions. Project was completed to the best of their ability. More effort was put into project than required. Excellent finished project.

Subjects:

Computers

Types:

Discuss this rubric