Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Learning Station Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Learning Station Rubric
Learning Station Rubric
Used to assess how well students participate, engage one another, meet the objectives and accomplish the tasks set at a self-directed learning station
Rubric Code:
RX47W3B
By
pcapella2004
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Learning Station Rubric
Excellent
10 pts
Above Average
8 pts
Average
6 pts
Minimal
4 pts
Poor
2 pts
Group Engagement
Excellent
-Group works together, in pairs, or individually to complete the Tasks as instructed.<BR>
-All group members interact well with each other without arguing.
Above Average
-Students do not always complete the Tasks as instructed.<BR>
-Student successfully breaks up arguments and returns the group to the task.
Average
-Student works with a partner or only part of the group when instructed to work as a whole group.
Minimal
-Student has minimal engagement with the rest of the group.<BR>
-Students argue instead of discussing.
Poor
-Student works individually or distracts other members from the tasks.
Group Tasks
Excellent
-All Learning Station Tasks (Group and Individual) are complete. Group work is high quality, professional, and aligned with Objectives.
Above Average
-Group work is high quality, professional, and aligned with Objectives.
Average
-Group work is complete with little variance from Objectives, Tasks or professional standards.
Minimal
-Group work is acceptable quality, but varies greatly from the Objectives or Tasks.
Poor
-Group work is incomplete.<BR>
-Group work is the product of 1 or 2 individuals (unless pair work is called for).
Participation
Excellent
-Student works hard to complete all tasks in the time given.
Above Average
-Student completes all tasks, but is distracted by other interests.
Average
-Student completes almost all tasks during class time and finishes for homework.
Minimal
-Student does minimal work, or rushes to complete quickly without regard to quality.<BR>
-Student displays off-task behavior.
Poor
-Student refuses to work.<BR>
-Student allows other group members to work without giving input.<BR>
-Student displays off-task behavior multiple times.
Individual Tasks
Excellent
-All Learning Station Tasks (Group and Individual) are complete. Individual work is high quality, professional, and aligned with Objectives. <BR>
-Writing assignments expand points and give detailed support well beyond the task.
Above Average
-Individual work is high quality, professional, and aligned with Objectives. <BR>
-Writing assignments expand points and give detailed support.
Average
-Individual work is complete with little variance from Objectives, Tasks or professional standards. <BR>
-Writing assignments give some support.
Minimal
-Individual work is acceptable quality, but varies greatly from the Objectives or Tasks.<BR>
-Writing assignments give little support and partially explain points.
Poor
-Individual work is incomplete.<BR>
-Writing assignments offer no support and do not explain points.
GUMS
(Grammar, Usage, Mechanics, Syntax)
Excellent
* No Grammar errors<BR>
* Well developed ideas and complex sentence structures<BR>
* No spelling errors.
Above Average
* 1 grammar, usage, mechanical issues.<BR>
* Well developed sentences.<BR>
* 1-2 Spelling errors.<BR>
* Errors do not affect readability
Average
* 2-3 grammar, usage, mechanical issues.<BR>
* Lacking developed sentences.<BR>
* 3 spelling errors.<BR>
* Errors do not affect readability
Minimal
* 4-5 grammar, usage, mechanical issues.<BR>
* Lacking developed sentences.<BR>
* 4 spelling errors.<BR>
* Errors affect readability somewhat
Poor
* 6+ grammar, usage, mechanical issues.<BR>
* Incomplete or run-on sentences<BR>
* 5+ spelling errors.<BR>
* Errors interfere with readability
Keywords:
critical thinking, English, reading, learning center, learning station
Subjects:
English
Social Sciences
Types:
Exam
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.