Skip to main content
iRubric: The Impact of Coaching of Behavior Change rubric

iRubric: The Impact of Coaching of Behavior Change rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
The Impact of Coaching of Behavior Change 
Research study critique
Locate existing research and theoretical writings pertinent to the effectiveness of coaching on positive, long-term health changes and goal acquisition. Find two to three empirical (data-based) articles that addresses this topic. Describe the articles you reviewed, its methods and findings, strengths and weaknesses. Identify and define research questions to navigate your search in gaining greater clarity and understanding of the field of coaching psychology and positive health outcomes.
Rubric Code: RX24623
By muechi
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Critical Thinking
  Exceeds Expectation

Exceeds assignment objectives

5 pts

Meets Expectation

Meets assignment objectives

3 pts

Below Expectation

Does not meet assignment objectives

1 pts

Theoretical Perspective

Fully explores topic
(2 pts)
Exceeds Expectation

Elaborates fully on topic acknowledging authors' findings and supports with professional sources/explanations. Has defined the concepts discussed, and uses clear and effective examples.

Topic examines the interaction of theoretical and performance interpretation showing direct application to technique and performance execution.
Meets Expectation

Elaborates on study using professional sources, and mentions other viewpoints, but does not clarify or support own views. Writer's perspective is acceptable but not sequentially formatted.

Topic examines the interaction of theoretical analysis and performance interpretation.
Below Expectation

Substanial inaccuracies in reporting the study methodologies, variables or findings. Elaboration of evidence is insufficient or not understandable to the reader. Basically, an opinion paper with faulty descriptors.
Raises important questions

(2 pts)
Exceeds Expectation

Raises important questions relevant to the assiged topic, and answers them with evidence from professional sources.
Meets Expectation

Raises questions related to the topic, but may not provide reader with adequate evidence for why these additional questions should be considered.
Below Expectation

Fails to raise any important questions related to the topic assigned. Does not meet the criteria of the assignment.
Analysis

Connecting theoretical concepts and evaluating merit
(2 pts)
Exceeds Expectation

Analysis is incorporated into the body of the paper to show significance.

Demonstrates understanding and application of the theory.
Meets Expectation

Broad or general analysis of the concept.

Briefly describes theoretical significance.
Below Expectation

Analysis is incomplete or missing.
Organization & Structure

Content
(2 pts)
Exceeds Expectation

Structure of the paper is clear.

Introduction previews all major points.
Meets Expectation

Introduction does not preview all major points.

Paragraph transitions need improvement.
Below Expectation

No structure present.

Paragraphs too long and ramblings.

Information presented in list style without thesis statements and form.
Spelling, Grammar, Usage

Mechanics
(1 pt)
Exceeds Expectation

Writing mechanics, word usage, grammar and spelling contain minimal errors that do not effect the paper's content.
Meets Expectation

Writing mechanics, word usage, grammar and spelling contains few errors that mostly do not effect the paper's content.
Below Expectation

Writing mechanics, word usage, grammar and spelling contain many errors that do effect the paper's content.
Sources & Citations

(1 pts)
Exceeds Expectation

Excellent reliability of professional sources. Use of source information within the paper is effective and necessary.
Meets Expectation

Use of professional sources without a thoughtful summary as to why the sources are relevant or how they enter into writer's discussion/critique
Below Expectation

No professional sources used or cited, and/or come from an unreliable source. Much of paper is copied from sources, no original work is evident.



Keywords:
  • critical thinking, evidence based writing

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60