Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Greek Ceramic Tile rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Greek Ceramic Tile
Clay Tile Like the Greek Potters
A ceramic tile inspired by the Olympics.
Rubric Code:
RC946B
By
kphariss
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Hand Built pots
Criteria Description
(N/A)
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Average
3 pts
Good+
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Construction
Criteria Description
Is the tile constructed according to directions. Width, length, height compare to example tile.
Does the tile looks complete.
Is the tile symmetrical.
Did the student used the standard, explained directions to build the tile?
Needs Improvement
The Tile is not constructed according to directions., Its depth, height and width do not match the example tile. the tile seems incomplete.
The tile is not symmetrical is not level, it looks as though there was not enough time spent working on the tile.
Average
The tile is a little closer to the construction given in directions.
The depth, length and width are somewhat closer to the example tile. It does not quite look complete. The tile is not completely symmetrical. It looks as though a little more time could be spent working on the tile.
Good+
The tile construction is very close to the directions. Depth, length and width are very close to example tile. The tile is very close symmetrical, and it looks like a good amount of time was spent working on the tile.
Excellent
The tile is constructed as given in directions. The depth, width and length match that of the example tile. The tile is symmetrical. A lot of time spent working on the tile.
Glazing/Surface Design
Criteria Description
How well did the student use good craftsmanship to refine details and apply glaze to tile? Is the design carved out with care and refinement?
Needs Improvement
The work appears to lack effort in craftsmanship. Little effort shown in paying attention to details. No effort made to go in to refine and clean up details. Glaze is sloppily applied.
Average
The work shows average craftsmanship. Most elements are fully covered in glaze, but could have been a bit neater. Carving of the design could have been more a bit neater.
Good+
The work shows good craftsmanship. Everything is glazed evenly and neatly. Carving is good, but could have been a bit more refined by additional clean up.
Excellent
The work shows excellent craftsmanship. All elements are glazed with extreme care. Carving is technically excellent & well refined.
Design/Creativity
Criteria Description
How complex was the chosen design for the tile?
How much creativity was put into the design on the tile?
How well did the student transfer the design onto the tile?
Needs Improvement
No complexity. No time taken to choose a design. It appears the student rushed just to get something. No creativity shown. Sloppy transfer to tile, rushed.
Average
Some complexity of design. The student took a little time to choose this design. But still a little rushed. A little creativity shown. Somewhat neater transfer but still a bit sloppy.
Good+
A good amount of complexity in design. The student took time to choose design. A good amount of creativity shown. Transfer to tile was carefully done.
Excellent
High complexity of design. Student took seriously the design they chose. High level of creativity. Transfer was near perfect and time was taken to ensure a good product.
Fulfills Assignment
Criteria Description
Did the student meet the student criteria that was discussed for assignment?
Needs Improvement
Appears as though the student paid little attention to the criteria that was discussed for the assignment.
Average
Student did not cover all of the criteria but did cover half of the criteria for the assignment.
Good+
Student did not cover all of the criteria but did cover at least 3/4 of the criteria for the assignment.
Excellent
Student did cover all of the criteria for the assignment.
Attitude
Criteria Description
Was the student willing to learn new ideas and processes?
Did the student work consistently on project?
Needs Improvement
Student is unwilling to learn new ideas and processes. Student ignored repeated requests to focus the project .
Student wasted most of class time.
Average
Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student should pay more attention to project during class. Student used some time appropriately.
Good+
Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student paid attention to work on project. Student used most time in class appropriately.
Excellent
Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student gave undivided to completion of project. Student used class time effectively to complete project.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
History
Types:
Class note
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Class note rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.