Skip to main content
iRubric: Greek Ceramic Tile rubric

iRubric: Greek Ceramic Tile rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Greek Ceramic Tile 
Clay Tile Like the Greek Potters
A ceramic tile inspired by the Olympics.
Rubric Code: RC946B
By kphariss
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Hand Built pots
  Criteria Description

(N/A)

Needs Improvement

1 pts

Average

3 pts

Good+

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Construction

Criteria Description

Is the tile constructed according to directions. Width, length, height compare to example tile.
Does the tile looks complete.
Is the tile symmetrical.
Did the student used the standard, explained directions to build the tile?
Needs Improvement

The Tile is not constructed according to directions., Its depth, height and width do not match the example tile. the tile seems incomplete.
The tile is not symmetrical is not level, it looks as though there was not enough time spent working on the tile.
Average

The tile is a little closer to the construction given in directions.
The depth, length and width are somewhat closer to the example tile. It does not quite look complete. The tile is not completely symmetrical. It looks as though a little more time could be spent working on the tile.
Good+

The tile construction is very close to the directions. Depth, length and width are very close to example tile. The tile is very close symmetrical, and it looks like a good amount of time was spent working on the tile.
Excellent

The tile is constructed as given in directions. The depth, width and length match that of the example tile. The tile is symmetrical. A lot of time spent working on the tile.
Glazing/Surface Design

Criteria Description

How well did the student use good craftsmanship to refine details and apply glaze to tile? Is the design carved out with care and refinement?
Needs Improvement

The work appears to lack effort in craftsmanship. Little effort shown in paying attention to details. No effort made to go in to refine and clean up details. Glaze is sloppily applied.
Average

The work shows average craftsmanship. Most elements are fully covered in glaze, but could have been a bit neater. Carving of the design could have been more a bit neater.
Good+

The work shows good craftsmanship. Everything is glazed evenly and neatly. Carving is good, but could have been a bit more refined by additional clean up.
Excellent

The work shows excellent craftsmanship. All elements are glazed with extreme care. Carving is technically excellent & well refined.
Design/Creativity

Criteria Description

How complex was the chosen design for the tile?
How much creativity was put into the design on the tile?
How well did the student transfer the design onto the tile?
Needs Improvement

No complexity. No time taken to choose a design. It appears the student rushed just to get something. No creativity shown. Sloppy transfer to tile, rushed.
Average

Some complexity of design. The student took a little time to choose this design. But still a little rushed. A little creativity shown. Somewhat neater transfer but still a bit sloppy.
Good+

A good amount of complexity in design. The student took time to choose design. A good amount of creativity shown. Transfer to tile was carefully done.
Excellent

High complexity of design. Student took seriously the design they chose. High level of creativity. Transfer was near perfect and time was taken to ensure a good product.
Fulfills Assignment

Criteria Description

Did the student meet the student criteria that was discussed for assignment?
Needs Improvement

Appears as though the student paid little attention to the criteria that was discussed for the assignment.
Average

Student did not cover all of the criteria but did cover half of the criteria for the assignment.
Good+

Student did not cover all of the criteria but did cover at least 3/4 of the criteria for the assignment.
Excellent

Student did cover all of the criteria for the assignment.
Attitude

Criteria Description

Was the student willing to learn new ideas and processes?
Did the student work consistently on project?
Needs Improvement

Student is unwilling to learn new ideas and processes. Student ignored repeated requests to focus the project .
Student wasted most of class time.
Average

Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student should pay more attention to project during class. Student used some time appropriately.
Good+

Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student paid attention to work on project. Student used most time in class appropriately.
Excellent

Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student gave undivided to completion of project. Student used class time effectively to complete project.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60