iRubric: Infographic rubric

» rubrics » iRubric: Infographic rubric »

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Infographic Communication, Concepts, and Skills Rubric Code: RBA832 By bcellsworth Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: (Other) Grade Levels: 6-8

Pre-post assessment Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Exceeds 4 pts
Communication Student was able to clearly communicate through writing and/or visual literacy.	Poor Student is unable to communicate clearly through writing due to lack of neatness, sentence structure or conventions. Struggles to communicate through visual literacy.	Fair Student is able to communicate adequately through writing but lacks conventions or neatness. Student represents some information through visual literacy.	Good Student can communicate well through writing using full sentences, proper conventions. Student represents information through visual literacy using appropriate diagrams and charts.	Exceeds Student can communicate well through writing using full sentences, proper conventions, and neatness. Student represents information through visual literacy using appropriate diagrams and charts in creative ways.
Concepts Student demonstrates comprehension of relevent concepts and relationships.	Poor Student has poor comprehension of the concepts covered.	Fair Student has preliminary comprehension of the concepts and relationships addressed in the content.	Good Student has a strong comprehension of the concepts and relationships addressed in the content.	Exceeds Student has an excellent comprehension of the concepts and relationships addressed in the content and could teach it to other students.
Skills Students can map, graph and summarize.	Poor Student demonstrates a growing skill-set that can not be applied.	Fair Student demonstrates a growing skill-set that can be applied.	Good Student demonstrates a strong skill-set that is applied appropriately.	Exceeds Student demonstrates a excellent skill-set that is applied in dynamic ways.
Cooperative Learning Student participated in the planning and execution of project	Poor Student was not an active participant in the cooperative learning group.	Fair Student was partially engaged but didn't fully participate in the project.	Good Student was a fully engaged and productive member of the cooperative learning team.	Exceeds Student was a fully engaged and productive member of the cooperative learning team and worked above and byond expection.