iRubric: Science Mobile rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Science Mobile Science Mobile The students will put together a mobile to show their understanding of the fast changes on earth (earthquakes, volcanoes, and landslides). Rubric Code: RAWWX7 By marizlp Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5

Project
	Exceeds 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Mobile Content	Exceeds The mobile includes all information relevant to the topic in an organized fashion.	Good Mobile includes all relevant information; however, it is not well-organized.	Fair Does not have all of the relevant information of the mobile.	Poor The mobile is lacking in elements required. There are many gaps in information presented.
Work quality/effort	Exceeds The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the learner is proud of his/her work. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the learner.	Good The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this project.	Fair Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.	Poor Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
Visual Aid	Exceeds The visual aid has an element of creativity and style, and is not just a list of facts. Information is presented in a clear and concise manner with full understanding of the subject.	Good The visual aid is clear and logical and contains facts as well as very few mistakes. Information is presented in a somewhat clear manner with fair understanding of the subject. Good clear visual presentation.	Fair The visual aid lacks style and reads more like a list of facts than an oral presentation. It lacks neatness and clarity.	Poor The visual aid does not reveal a clear understanding of the subject matter and there are many errors. The poster lacks neatness and clarity. Poster is not creative.