Skip to main content

iRubric: Persuasive Speech Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
This rubric sets criteria for grading the Persuasive Speech presentations.
Rubric Code: RA6BW3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric General
  Poor

1

(N/A)

Fair

2

(N/A)

Good

5

(N/A)

Excellent

10

(N/A)

Vocal Presentation

Poor

Student was very hard to hear, had very poor articulation, spoke much too quickly, took unnecessary pauses, etc. Vocal presentation made it very hard to understand the information being communicated.
Fair

Student has a basically clear vocal presentation, with a few areas of mispronunciation, excessive use of filler words, rapid rate of speech, volume issues, etc..
Good

Student spoke clearly, articulated well, loud enough for everyone in audience to hear, slowly enough so that audience could understand and did not use any unnecessary pauses or mispronounced words.
Excellent

Student's vocal presentation went beyond basic functionality to include uses of vocal variety and language use that created an engaging performance.
Physical Presentation

Poor

Student did not make eye contact with the audience, had lot of extra movement, slouched, held hands behind back, was dressed inappropriately etc... Their physical presentation distracted from their speech.
Fair

Student slumped over podium or leaned on table, had lots of unnecessary movement, or didn't use their hands for gestures, etc... Student had moments of eye contact with the audience, but spent parts of the speech focused on the outline, back wall, table, was dressed inappropriately but not distractingly, etc...
Good

Student had good posture and use of gestures. Student maintained good eye contact with entire room during the speech.
Excellent

Student integrated posture, gestures, and other nonverbal behaviors so that they completed and enhanced the speech.
Extemporaneous Presentation

Poor

Student read directly from the outline, maintaining very little contact with the audience during the presentation.
Fair

Student relied heavily on the outline, becoming lost or confused and needing long pauses to reorient himself/herself.
Good

Student had moments of good explanation of the process, but relied on the outline more than necessary.
Excellent

Student was able to explain the process conversationally, maintaining good contact with the audience throughout the speech, and only referring to the outline periodically.
Introduction
  Poor

1

(N/A)

Fair

2

(N/A)

Good

5

(N/A)

Excellent

10

(N/A)

Engaged Audience

Poor

Student did not use any techniques to engage audience interest, or the attempt was made in an incoherent and disorganized fashion.
Fair

Student attempted to engage audience interest, but the effort was incomplete, disorganized, or was negated by poor delivery.
Good

Student used a story, hypothetical, rhetorical question, or other technique to attempt to attain the interest of the audience.
Excellent

Student actively engaged the audience with a well practiced and delivered rhetorical device.
Reveal Topic

Poor

Student did not state the topic of the speech.
Fair

Student stated the topic of the speech, but it was unclear or misleading.
Good

Student clearly stated the topic of the speech.
Excellent

Student clearly stated the topic of the speech in a creative, innovative, or other rhetorically interesting way.
Body
  Poor

1

(N/A)

Fair

2

(N/A)

Good

5

(N/A)

Excellent

10

(N/A)

Organization/Demonstration

Poor

Speech had no background information, and no conclusion. The explanation of the informative speech seemed to be in the wrong order, and/or confusing for the audience. Any visual aids did not coordinate with the presentation at all.
Fair

The information itself was clear, but needed a defined structure. Any demonstration elements were not well coordinated with the speech. Student needed more practice.
Good

Speech explained all the elements of the topic in an logical order. Any visual aids were logical and done smoothly. It was obvious the presentation had been practiced.
Excellent

Student used imagination and creativity in explaining the information so that audience members could fully understand it, using a well practiced approach with any visual aids integrated smoothly.
Speaking outline

Poor

Student came unprepared with no form of notes other than the preparation outline.
Fair

Student's speaking outline was poorly done tot he point that it detracted from performance; poor handwriting, too much text, confusing formatting, etc.
Good

Student's speaking outline effectively aided in the execution of the speech.
Excellent

Student's speaking outline was effective and formatted in the style recommended by the textbook.
Conclusion
  Poor

1

(N/A)

Fair

2

(N/A)

Good

5

(N/A)

Excellent

10

(N/A)

Reinforced Central Idea

Poor

Student did not reinforce the central idea as part of the conclusion.
Fair

Student attempted to reinforce the central idea, but did not clearly execute a summation or other appropriate technique.
Good

Student clearly reinforced the central idea in a way that brought the speech to a clear finish.
Excellent

Student used an appropriate and memorable method of reinforcing the central idea, such as a summation, quotation, or other method.
Time Management
Speech is only 3 minutes in length so management of time is crucial
  Poor

1

(N/A)

Fair

3

(N/A)

Good

4

(N/A)

Excellent

5

(N/A)

Total time:

Poor

Anything over a minute short or long
Fair

More than 30 seconds over or under
Good

Less than 30 seconds over or under
Excellent

Sufficient use of all 3 minutes no more or less




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178