iRubric: Food Article Findings Report rubric

Student didn't have a good reason as to why they chose their article. Should have elaborated on their thoughts more.
No questions were proposed to be answered.

Student was somewhat vague as to why they chose the article and could have expanded more on their personal thoughts of the findings.
Only 1 questions was proposed to be answered by the article.

Student had a thoughtful reason as to why they chose their article, and gave great detail in their explanation of what they hoped to learn. At least 2 questions were proposed to be answered by the article.

Response is vaguely mentioned or missing.

Responses are there, but lacking detail. Student could have gone in more depth.

Responses are through, in depth and well thought out.

Response is vaguely mentioned or missing.

Responses are there, but lacking detail. Student could have gone in more depth.

Responses are through, in depth and well thought out.

Response is vaguely mentioned or missing.

Responses are there, but lacking detail. Student could have gone in more depth.

Responses are through, in depth and well thought out.

Summary was vague or missing. Student didn't recap the information in a way that was usable for the class. Didn't address the questions asked at the beginning of the presentation or restate the nutritional advise found.

Overview was presented but somewhat confusing. Student didn't possess enough knowledge of what the article was trying to convey. Only answered one of the questions asked at the beginning of the presentation. Students could take away information from this presentation, but still left us wanting to know more details.

Overview was through and to the point. Student addressed the questions presented at the beginning of the presentation or recapped the findings they found instead (if they weren't able to answer the questions). Nutritional advise/takeaway message was clear, accurate and easily understood.