Skip to main content

iRubric: Oral Presentation Evaluation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Oral Presentation Evaluation Oral Presentation Evaluation FNP III Case Study Rubric Code: R537W3 By powersp Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Medical Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Graduate

Case Presentation
	Excellent 9.5 pts	Good 8.5 pts	Average 7.5 pts	Fair 6.5 pts	Poor 0 pts
Presentation Style 20 % Does the student articulate well with confidence, professionalism, eye contact, and voice projection while presenting?	Excellent The student appears confident, professional, makes excellent eye contact and voice projection. Delivers presentation with fluent speech and pertinent vocabulary.	Good The student appears confident, professional, makes good eye contact and voice projection. Delivers presentation with fluent speech and pertinent vocabulary.	Average The student appears moderately confident making good eye contact but presentation is delivered with mispronunciation of pertinent vocabulary. Difficult to hear at times.	Fair The student appears nervous and has minimal eye contact. Presentation is delivered with mispronunciation of pertinent vocabulary. Difficult to hear.	Poor The student does not make eye contact with the audience. Presentation is delivered with use of slang and mispronunciation of words. The student was unprofessional.
Presentation Guidelines 20 % The student will follow format provided to present a case study of a patient that will include the patient's history, laboratory exams/test, disease state review, medication review and plan. Are there spelling/grammar issues?	Excellent Presentation involved a complex actual patient and meets all of the guidelines.	Good Presentation meets most of the guidelines.	Average Presentation meets most of the guidelines.	Fair Presentation does not meet most of the guidelines or there was inadequate information presented.	Poor Presentation meets few of the guidelines or not based on an actual patient.
Time Limit/References 20 % Does the presentation meet the time limit guidelines? Accurate reference citations? Appropriate use of literature?	Excellent The presentation met the minimum time limit. Accurate citations. Appropriate literature use.	Good The presentation fell within the time limit. Accurate citations. One inappropriate literature source.	Average The presentation met the minimum time limit but did not cite all slides. One inappropriate literature source.	Fair The presentation exceeded the maximum time limit. Some slides not cited. Few inappropriate literature source.	Poor The presentation fell short of the minimum time limit. All slides not cited. Several inappropriate literature sources.
Content 20 % Is there adequate information presented? Is it organized in a logical progression of ideas? Are appropriate objectives established and addressed?	Excellent Adequate information presented. The information is well organized and logical. Objectives are appropriate and addressed.	Good Adequate information presented. The information is well organized and logical. Objectives are either not appropriate or addressed.	Average Adequate information presented. The information is well organized but it does not remain focused. Objectives are either not appropriate or addressed.	Fair Too much information presented. The information is not organized in a logical manner, does not remain focused. Objectives are not appropriate or all addressed.	Poor Not enough information presented. The information is not organized in a logical manner, does not remain focused. Objectives not appropriate or all addressed.
Conclusion 20 % Is the student able to answer questions effectively? Patient adequately assessed and plan (safety, efficacy, cost) is appropriate. Primary literature is adequately summarized and statistical and clinical significance is determined appropriately.	Excellent Student is successful in answering questions. Assessment and plan is appropriate. Literature significance if used is appropriate.	Good Student is successful in answering most questions. Assessment and plan is appropriate. Literature significance is appropriate.	Average Student is successful in answering most questions. Assessment or plan is incomplete. Literature significance is lacking.	Fair Student is successful in answering few questions. Assessment and plan is incomplete. Literature significance is lacking.	Poor Student is unable to answer questions. Assessment and plan is not appropriate. Literature significance is not appropriate.

Subjects:

Medical

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Medical rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202