- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Final Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Final Presentation Rubric Code: R4W666 By amisset Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Reading Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Final Presentation
	1-2 (N/A)	3-4 (N/A)	5-6 (N/A)
Summarized Literature Circles	1-2 Description of roles and purpose is not well-defined and unclear; other students wouldn't know how to participate	3-4 Good description of roles, but could have been clearer. Students would need more help to participate in literature circle.	5-6 Clear, thorough description of roles and purpose. Other students could participate.
Summarized Text	1-2 Unclear or incomplete summary of text. Does not convey the "big picture"	3-4 Text was retold but could have been clearer, better organized or contained more important information; "big picture" is a little unclear	5-6 Thorough summary of text. Well organized and contained the most important ideas. Conveys the "big picture" with supporting details.
Expanded Background of Text	1-2 Provided no new and interesting information related to the text from further research like internet links, images or videos or provided incorrect information	3-4 Some new and interesting information provided related to the text.	5-6 Provided new and interesting information related to the text from further research like internet links, images or videos
Use of Technology	1-2 Did not use digital format for presentation; or did not provide any images, links or video.	3-4 Used digital format to present information, but did not fit the needs of the project. Could have used more images, links or video to enhance presentation.	5-6 Good use of Powerpoint or other digital format to present information; easy to read, hear and provide links, images, and video
Mechanics/Format	1-2 Many mistakes; difficult to read.	3-4 Some mistakes of grammar; could have been written in more varied format or with more vivid language.	5-6 Writes using correct grammar, varied sentence structure, details and vivid language.
Collaboration	1-2 Lack of teamwork or group participation. Little or no help provided to peers.	3-4 Good participation from most members. Some editing and revising of peer's work.	5-6 Edits and revises peer's writing. Equal participation of members. Good teamwork!