Skip to main content

iRubric: AP 2D Breadth Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AP 2D Breadth Rubric 
Final Drawing Rubric
Rubric Code: R47CB4
By jenniferprince
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric AP Drawing Concentration
  Excellent

6 pts

Strong

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Moderate

3 pts

Weak

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Concept

Evidence of thinking and focus.
Expression of individual artistic voice
Excellent

The idea is original and engages the viewer.
Obvious personal Artistic Voice; complex visual and/or conceptual ideas.
Strong

Good, strong, original idea. Demonstrates some personal voice or evocative qualities.
Good

There is some sense of purpose/direction, but it may not be fully resolved.
No real individual ida or artistic voice.
Moderate

Conscious choice of design to match intent of work: may be too simplistic.
Artistic voice is minimal.
Weak

The idea is appropriate, but not fully followed through.
Artistic voice is minimal.
Poor

No clear direction.
No expression of personality.
Graphics Clarity

Graphics are clear and coherant. Effective use of the principles of desgin.
Excellent

Graphics are used
effectively and are realted to the total design. Has excellent placement and sizing.
Text, if used, matches the feel of the design and is clear without being overpowering.
Strong

All graphics relate to the design, yet sizing/placement of important graphics could make idea/emphasis more clear.
Good

Most graphics used are related to
the content of the
design. Placement and/or sizing could have been better.
Moderate

Most graphics are
focused on topic, but
could have been
used more clear and precise on the graphic. Text, if used, could be more clear.
Weak

Graphics do not fully express a clear meaning for this project. Text is either overpowering or gets lost in the design.
Poor

Graphics fail to
convey the meaning
of the project and there is
a lack of understanding
demonstrated
by poor
sizing or placement.
Development/Investigation

Degree of development (growth) and investigation evident in the work
Excellent

Excellent technical skills. Graphics are expressive and intentional.
Shows informed risk-taking/Exploration of media used.
Strong

Evident skill, technically competent, evocative theme.
Evidence of some risk-taking.
Good

Technically competent.
Some growth and discovery are evident. Minimal risk-taking.
Moderate

Some growth is evident, but problems are not successfully resolved.
Is more technical than conceptual, no real ambition.
Weak

Design is too simplistic. Graphics are awkward or erratic.
Poor

Major problems; lacks understanding of relationships of elements and principles.
Quality

Quality of concept and technique in the work
Excellent

Powerful Composition.
Strong focal point.
Strong

Very Strong Composition.
Is generally strong, but shows some inconsistencies in overall quality.
Good

General Composition is good, but may not be very engaging.
Moderate

Limited Composition shows stronger emphasis on the elements than on the principles.
Weak

Lacks innovation.
Lack of detail.
Compositional issues such as excessive negative space, minimal background development, and static placement.
Poor



Keywords:
  • AP Concentration



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178