Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Computer Component Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Computer Component Rubric
Computer Component Rubric
This rubric helped grade a 4-page research paper completed by my CGS 2100 Computer Fundamentals and Apllications class. Its purpose is to research components and price comparison in order to build a personal computer.
Rubric Code:
R435CA
By
tophat2010
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Computers
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Persuasive Paper Rubric
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Below Average
(N/A)
Unacceptable
(N/A)
Research (20 pts.)
Excellent
Research was extremely well developed (10 pts.)
Good
Research was completed (7 pts.)
Fair
Research was attempted but incomplete (4 pts.)
Below Average
Research was attempted but was very incomplete
(1 pt.)
Unacceptable
No research was attempted (0 pts.)
Price Comparison (15 pts.)
Excellent
Excellent (15 pts.)
There is abundant Price Comparison and was concsie and well presented.
Good
Good (12 pts.)
There is good prince comparision and was presented well
Fair
Fair (9 pts.)
There was "some" prince comparison, but presented well.
Below Average
Below Average (7 pts.)
No price comparision, but components were presented well.
Unacceptable
Unacceptable (0 pts.)
No price comparison and no presentation.
Organization (15 pts.)
Excellent
Excellent (10 pts.)
Paper clearly followed model in packet. Had an introduction that hooked the reader into the paper. Also had a clear beginning, middle, and end. Paragraphs had at least 5-7 sentences. Effective transitions were used.
Good
Good (8 pts.)
For the most part, paper followed model given. Introduction hooked the reader. Had a beginning, middle and end. Most paragraphs had 5-7 sentences and transitions were used.
Fair
Fair (6 pts. )
The paper made some attempt to follow the model given. The writer tried to create an introduction to grab the reader's attention. Some paragraphs had between 5-7 sentences and some transitions were used. structure the argument has been made, but the structure is poorly developed.
Below Average
Below Average (4 pts.)
Introduction was trite, showing little originality. Paper jumped from topic to topic with little or no apparent organization.
Unacceptable
Unacceptable (0 pts.)
There was a total lack of structure.
Diction (15 pts)
Excellent
Excellent (5 pts.)
Formal diction in Standard English was used throughout the paper. No slang was used, and the writer used the third person point of view throughout the paper.
Good
Good (4 pts.)
Formal diction in standard English was used throughout most of the essay. Only one slang word was used and the writer used third person viewpoint throughout almost all of the paper.
Fair
Fair (3 pts.)
Formal diction in Standard English was used in about half of the paper. Several slang words were used and the writer shifted viewpoints through about half of the paper.
Below Average
Below Average (2 pts. )
Little formal diction in Standard English was used and the writer shifted viewpoints (1st, 2nd, and 3rd) throughout most of the paper.
Unacceptable
Unacceptable (0 pts.)
Paper was not written in Standard English.
Format (15 pts.)
Excellent
Excellent (10 pts.)
Paper was a full 4 pages long. It was done in the proper MLA format with title and works cited pages.
All papers and notecards were in a bound folder from the first to the last.
Good
Good (8 pts.)
Paper was nearly 4 pages long in the proper MLA format. It had a title and works cited pages. Papers and notecards were bound in a folder.
Fair
Fair (6 pts.)
Paper was 3 to 21/2 pages long but some of it did not follow MLA format. It had a title and works cited pages, but some of those had incorrect MLA elements. It was in a bound folder.
Below Average
Below Average (3 pts. )
Paper was 3 or fewer pages long and many of its elements did not follow MLA format. The title and/or works cited page was missing. It was in a loose folder and some elements were missing.
Unacceptable
Unacceptable (0 pts.)
The paper was four or fewer pages long and seemingly no attempt at following MLA format was made. It was not in a bound folder and elements were missing.
Conventions (20)
Excellent
Excellent (20 pts.)
No mistakes in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
Good
Good (18 pts.)
Four or fewer mistakes in spelling, punctuation and grammar.
Fair
Fair (15 pts. )
Five or fewer mistakes in spelling punctuation and grammar.
Below Average
Below Average) (10 pts. )
Six to 14 mistakes in spelling, punctuation, grammar.
Unacceptable
Unacceptable (0 pts. )
Fifteen or more errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
Keywords:
Research, writing, paper, technology,
Subjects:
Computers
English
Types:
Project
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.