- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Research Paper-Workshop rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Research Paper-Workshop Research Paper This rubric is a guide for writing your 2 page paper about wikis in education. Rubric Code: R3CB66 By Jcoolwoman Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: Graduate

Wiki Paper
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Basic Requirements	Poor Fulfills minimal requirements with incorrect information. Does not thoroughly address basic requirements.	Fair Reports on wiki but does not detail how it can be used in education.	Good Fulfills all basic requirements.	Excellent Provides relevant and accurate material beyond the basic requirements of 2 pages.
Content Standards NSDC Standards for Staff Development-Content-Deepens educators knowledge, provides them with instructional strategies to assist students in the classroom	Poor Content does not provide information that of instructional strategies to assist students in learning.	Fair Provides evidence of new knowledge but lacks evidence of instructional strategies to assist student learning.	Good Provides evidence of deepened knowledge and includes some instructional strategies to assist students in learning.	Excellent Provides deepth of knowledge and many instructional strategies to assist students in learning.
Context Standards NSDC's standards-Requires resources to support adult learning and collaboration.	Poor Resources not included.	Fair 2-4 resources included	Good 5 resources included.	Excellent More than 5 resources included.
Facilitates & Inspires ISTE NETS*T standard 1a	Poor Does not support, promote or model creative or innovative thinking or inventiveness	Fair Some support to model creative and innovative thinking and inventiveness.	Good Supports and promotes creative and innovative thinking.	Excellent Provides many ideas to support creative and innovative thinking and innovativeness.
Requirements Met ISTE NETS*T standards 5c-evaluates and reflects on current research	Poor Does not finish paper or does not reflect on current research.	Fair Evidence that teacher evaluated and reflected on current research.	Good Multiple examples of current research were evaluated.	Excellent Goes above and beyond to research and evaluate current research.