iRubric: Frankenstein Media Project #1 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Frankenstein Media Project #1 Rubric Code: R3994X By dnlbees Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Frankenstein Media Project #1
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts
Content Information is accurate, well researched, detailed, and complete	Poor Information is inaccurate, does not demonstrate well-researched work, and/or is not complete.	Fair Information fairly accurate, research is minimal, lacks detail.	Good Information is accurate, well researched, detailed, and complete.
Presentation Presents and communicates information clearly, demonstrates full group participation	Poor Information lacks clearness. Does not demonstrates full group participation.	Fair Information is slightly unclear. Demonstrates most of the group members' participation.	Good Presents and communicates information clearly, demonstrates full group participation
Creativity Media presentation is creative and demonstrates critical thinking, builds connections, and personal reflections.	Poor Media presentation is not creative and does not demonstrate critical thinking, connections, or personal reflections.	Fair Media presentation attempts creativity, critical thinking, connections, and personal reflections.	Good Media presentation is creative and demonstrates critical thinking, builds connections, and personal reflections.
Write up Group's write up explains members' research, how the media presentation relates well to the content and to Frankenstein, and inputs personal reaction towards the research.	Poor Group's write up does not explain members' research, or how the media presentation relates well to the content and to Frankenstein. Write up is incomplete.	Fair Group's write up attempts to explain members' research and how the media presentation relates well to the content and to Frankenstein.	Good Group's write up explains members' research, how the media presentation relates well to the content and to Frankenstein, and inputs personal reaction towards the research.