Skip to main content
iRubric: Parliamentary Procedure rubric

iRubric: Parliamentary Procedure rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Parliamentary Procedure 
FFA Parliamentary Procedure
Business Essentials Parliamentary Procedure 3-5 Minute Parliamentary Procure Script and Video Presentation
Rubric Code: R34658
By hildetony
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Parliamentary Procedure
Enter rubric description
  Poor

(N/A)

Struggling

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Striving

(N/A)

Outstanding

(N/A)

Knowledge of Parli. Procedure

Enter criteria description
Poor

Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 1 or zero abilities.
(1-20PTS.)
Struggling

Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 2 abilities. (21-40PTS.)
Good

Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 3 abilities.
(41-60 PTS.)
Striving

Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 4 abilities. (61-80PTS.)
Outstanding

Used proper parliamentary procedure to complete 5 (all) abilities.
(81-100 PTS.)
Poise and Manner Displayed

Enter criteria description
Poor

Few or none of the items of business were discussed with poise and dignity, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(1-10 PTS.)
Struggling

Some of the items of business were discussed with with a moderate level of poise and dignity, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(11-20 PTS.)
Good

Some of the items of business were discussed with poise and dignity in a businesslike manner, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(21-30 PTS.)
Striving

The majority of the items of business were discussed with poise and dignity in a businesslike manner, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(31-40PTS.)
Outstanding

All items of business were discussed with poise and dignity in a businesslike manner, using proper parliamentary procedure.
(41-50PTS.)
Grammar and Sentence Structure

Scrip
Poor

Discussion did not include clear and concise statements. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was weak.
(1-20 PTS.)
Struggling

Little of the discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was below average.
(21-40PTS.)
Good

Some discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was average.
(41-60 PTS.)
Striving

The majority of the discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was moderately strong.
(61-80PTS.)
Outstanding

All discussion was clear, concise and well-phrased. The team's demonstration of their knowledge of parliamentary procedure was strong.
(81-100 PTS.)
Voice and Expression

Individual Involvement in whole project
Poor

None of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(1-20 PTS.)
Struggling

Few of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(21-40 PTS.)
Good

Some of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Some of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(41-60 PTS.)
Striving

Most of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Most of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(61-80 PTS.)
Outstanding

All team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(81-100 PTS.)
Questions

Questions presented and answered in the presentation
Poor

Answered 1 or zero questions correctly with significant hesitation.
(1-20 PTS.)
Struggling

Answered 2 questions correctly with significant hesitation.
(21-40 PTS.)
Good

Answered 3 questions correctly with some hesitation.
(41-60 PTS.)
Striving

Answered 4 questions correctly, with very little hesitation.
(61-80 PTS.)
Outstanding

Answered 5 (all) questions correctly, with no hesitation.
(81-100 PTS.)
Proper recognition of Members

Proper recognition of chair and all members
Poor

Did not recognized positions and responsibilities of the members in the Parli-Pro Project



1-20
Struggling

Members were recongnized partially with unclear roles of the group




21-60
Good

Members were properly recognized but not through the whole project




61-80
Striving

Chair and all members were properly recognized and noticeable throughout whole project presentation


81-100 pts
Outstanding
Coverage of Presentation agenda

Poor

Team did not follow agenda




1-30
Struggling

Team did not address all agenda items properly



31-60
Good

Team addressed all agenda items properly



61-100
Striving
Outstanding
Demonstration Time

Poor

Did not meet Presentation time





1-50
Struggling

Met Presentation Time






51-100
Good
Striving
Outstanding






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60