iRubric: Single-Blind or Double-Blind Experiment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Single-Blind or Double-Blind Experiment Single-Blind or Double-Blind (taste test) experiment 20 participants Rubric Code: R33WX7 By vreest Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Single or Double Blind Experiment
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 5 pts	Good 10 pts
Concept/Hypothesis	Poor Both the type pf experiment and the hypothesis is missing	Fair Either the type of experiment or the hypothesis is missing	Good Type of experiment and hypothesis is present
Materials	Poor No materials list is present	Fair Materials list lacks details such as number of items needed	Good Materials list is detailed and accurate
Assembly	Poor No assembly instructions are listed	Fair Some details are missing so it would be difficult for another person to replicate the assembly preparations	Good Another person could easily replicate the assembly preparations
Procedure	Poor No procedure instructions are listed	Fair Some procedual steps are listed by may be difficult for another person to replicate experiement	Good Another person could easily replicate the experiment from the detailed, step-by-step procedural section
Observations	Poor No observations about participant choice	Fair Sketchy observations about participant choice	Good Clear and detailed observations about participant choice
Data Sheet/Graph	Poor No data sheet or graph is present	Fair Hard to interpret/not clear data sheet or graph is present	Good Clear, easy to read, and labeled data sheet or graph is present
Analyze Results	Poor No analysis of results	Fair Sketchy analysis of results	Good Clear and detailed analysis of results
20 participants	Poor No participants were used for experiment	Fair Less than 20 participants were used for experiment	Good 20 or participants were used for experiment
Oral Presentation	Poor could not explain the experiment	Fair Lacking some knowledge about experiment...some parts hard to understand	Good Very knowledgeable about experiment, clear, detailed, and understandable
Neatness	Poor Not done	Fair Sloppy work which is hard to follow	Good Neat, colorful, detailed presentation which is easy to follow