Skip to main content
iRubric: Editted Copy of Persuasive Essay Rubric

iRubric: Editted Copy of Persuasive Essay Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Editted Copy of Persuasive Essay Rubric 
Editted Copy of Persuasive Essay Rubric
I will use this rubric to score and grade the completed persuasive power point presentation for each group in 7th grade
Rubric Code: R25487
By Lark22
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Persuasive Power Point
  Superior

20 pts

Good

15 pts

Fair

10 pts

Poor

5 pts

Organization of Project

Superior

This project is organized. There is a natural flow to the writitng, where the progression to one part to the next is a logical connection. The is a clear and precise stance taken. There are more than 5 supporting reasons with research evidence to back up more than 3 of the reasons.
Good

Project is organized. There is a natural flow to the writing, where the progression to one part to the next is a logical connection. There is a clear and precise stance taken. There are at least 5 supporting reasons with research evidence to back at least 3 of the reasons.
Fair

Project is moderatly organized with some flow and each part is loosely connected to the next. There is a stance, but it is not clearly stated. There are 2-4 supporting reasons with research to back 1-2 of the reasons.
Poor

Structure of project is unorganized with no clear flow from one slide to the next. No clear stance is taken. There are 0-1 supporting reasons with no research evidence to back the reason.
Use of Persuasive Elements

Superior

Through use of extensive research. The project achieves it's goals and went beyond the requirements to add depth more to the project.More than one persuasive technique.
Good

Through use of much reason and research. The project acheives it's goal of persuading the reader. At least one persuasive technique was used.
Fair

Through the use of some reseach and reason, the project argues a perspective without fully convincing the reader. One partial persuasive technique was used.
Poor

Through the lack of reseach and reason, the project does not successfully argue the perspective and does not convince the reader of the stance. No persuasive technique was used.
Length

Superior

The project has more than 10 slides and no more than 13
Good

The project has 10 slides or less.
Fair

The project has 7 slides are less.
Poor

The project has less than 5 slides.
Research Citation

Superior

More than 5 sources are correctly cited.
Good

3-5 sources are correctly cited.
Fair

Only 1-2 sources are cited.
Poor

No cited research included in the paper
Grammar/ Content Accuracy

Superior

Project contain no errors. All content throughout the project is accurate.
Good

Project contains less than 4 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
Fair

Project contains between 5-9 grammatical and/or spelling errors
Poor

Project contains more than 10 gramatical and/or spelling errors.
Originality

Superior

Presentation shows considerable orignality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way.
Good

Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way.
Fair

Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on a few slides.
Poor

Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.
Use of Graphics

Superior

All graphics are attractive (size and color) and support the theme/content of the presentation. Great use of headings and bullets to orginize informtion.
Good

A few graphics are not attractive to the presentation but all support the theme and content. The headings and bulleted lists are organized, but overall organization of topic appears flawed.
Fair

All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/contnet of the presentation. Little to no headings or bullets.
Poor

Several graphics are unattractive and detract from the content of the presentation. No headings or bullets to organize information.
Sources

Superior

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documents in required format.
Good

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documents in required format.
Fair

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes, but not in required format.
Poor

Very little to no source information.
Execution

Superior

Presenter was fully prepared and had an excellent working knowledge of the material. Good eye contact and flow. Voice was loud and clear.
Good

Presenter was prepared but had to check notes occasionally. Was not above average in presentation skills. Voice was partially loud and mostly clear.
Fair

Presenter was not prepared int their presentation. Read from notes and the slide with little eye contact to class. Hard to hear.
Poor

Presenter did not know thier material. Read from notes/ slides with no eye contact to class.



Keywords:
  • persuasive writing

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178