- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: ENG 391: My Teaching Story rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ENG 391: My Teaching Story Literacy Autobiography A personal reflection connected to your experiences with learning and teaching. Rubric Code: QXAW52X By schmidtp Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Text Feature
	Excellent 25 pts	Good 20 pts	Poor 15 pts
An analytical voice	Excellent Experiences are reflected on for their place in literacy development. The focus is analysis, not narration. Links with teaching are strong.	Good Experiences are narrated and occasionally reflected on. The focus switches back and forth from analysis to mere narration.	Poor The paper has a narrative emphasis. The writer tells a story and only minimally reflects on literacy development.
Perspectives	Excellent The paper includes thoughts on writing to learn, from the writer’s perspective as both a teacher and a student	Good The paper may not have thoughts on writing to learn, or may have only a student or a teacher perspective.	Poor Thoughts on writing to learn may not be present
Focus	Excellent Clear description and careful choice of selected reading and writing memories, good or bad, and becoming literate in the content area	Good It is not obvious why these particular experiences were chosen or how the writer became literate in the content area.	Poor Experiences may seem chosen because they ought to be rather than because of their significance. A history of becoming literate in the content area may be missing or vague.
Conventions	Excellent Writing has few or no errors in usage, spelling and punctuation. Sentence structure is varied. Overall, the writing reflects graduate student expectations.	Good Writing has errors in usage, spelling, and/or punctuation. Sentences may be complete but may not flow in readability. The writing is competent but not clearly graduate.	Poor Usage, spelling, and/or punctuation show serious problems and lack of proofreading. Sentences are simple and unvaried. Writing is not at a graduate level.