Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Business Organization Project/ Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Business Organization Project/ Presentation
Business Plan PowerPoint Presentation Rubric
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your PowerPoint presentation project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when calculating the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the PowerPoint presentation, to ensure that all intended elements of your powerpoint have been represented and all other criteria have been met.
Rubric Code:
QX855X7
By
Jeatlaw
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Business Plan Presentation - Rubric
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Business Plan Content
Excellent
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Plan components are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Research is adequate and timely.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
-Interesting to read.
- Structure of the paragraph is clear and easy to follow.
-Flow of ideas fluid and logical.
Good
Content is somewhat comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Plan components are addressed, and somewhat supported.
- Research is adequate.
- Content and purpose of the writing is mostly clear.
- Structure of the paragraph is easy to follow.
- Flow of ideas are mostly fluid and logical.
Fair
Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Plan components are addressed, but not well supported.
- Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
- Structure of the paragraph is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
Poor
- Plan components are incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts
Power Point/Graphics
Excellent
Business is explained clearly and in an organized manner. All slides included correct information.
Slides are attractive. Text is easy to read.
Graphics and effects/transitions are used throughout to enhance presentation
Good
Business is somewhat explained but more information is required. Slides are attractive. Text is easy to read.
Some slides use graphics and effects to enhance presentation
Fair
Business is slightly explained but more material is needed. Slides are easy to read. Amount of text is too great for the amount of space.
Few slides have graphics or effects.
Poor
Business is addressed but not explained or elaborated on. The slides are difficult to read.
There is little use of graphics or effects.
Grammar, Vocabulary, Spelling/Forms
Excellent
Wide range of structures with few or no significant errors.
- Rules of grammar and vocabulary usage followed.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
-Little or no evidence of English interference.
Very few or no faults with respect to spelling
All references to source materials are clearly and properly cited without significant errors.
All forms correctly completed for construction of business form.
Good
Wide range of structures with few or no significant errors.
- Rules of grammar and vocabulary usage followed.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
-Little or no evidence of English interference.
Very few or no faults with respect to spelling
Most references to source materials are clearly and properly cited without significant errors.
Most forms correctly completed for construction of business form.
Fair
Paper contains few grammatical errors.
- Language lacks clarity at times.
-Vocabulary accurate but may be somewhat limited.
-Some areas of English interference may be present but meaning rarely obscured.
Occasional faults in spelling
Most references to source materials are clearly and properly cited
Most forms for proper construction of business form
Poor
- Paper contains numerous grammatical errors.
-Meaning blocked as text dominated by errors.
-Range of vocabulary extremely limited.
-English interference frequent.
-Frequent errors in spelling,
Few references to source materials are clearly and properly cited.
Incomplete forms for proper construction of business form.
Presentation 2.5
Excellent
2.5 Speaker(s) present in a clear voice, with emphasis. They make eye contact with the audience, and do not read from screen.
Time management was performed with precision. Slides were concise and all members of the group contributed an equal amount to attaining the desired presentation duration.
Good
2.0 Speaking voice is fairly clear, with some emphasis. Some eye contact with audience. Some reading from screen.
Time management was performed well. All members of the group contributed in some manner to the presentation. Presentation duration was slightly under or exceeded the specified duration. Rehearsal could be used to ensure the presentation duration is met.
Fair
1.5 Speaker(s) present in an unclear voice, or with little emphasis, or constantly reads from the screen.
Lacking time management. Not all members of the group presented equal amounts of time and the group did not attain or greatly exceeded the desired presentation length
Poor
1.0 Speaker(s) does not present in a clear voice, speaks with no emphasis, and reads simply from the presentation.
Time management was not performed. Not all members of the group contributed in the presentation. Presentation was not rehearsed and as a result presentation was well under/over the desired presentation length.
Individual Collaboration 2.5
Excellent
2.5
Frequent and significant participation and input to group discussion
Good
2.0
Frequent and some significant participation and input to group discussion
Fair
1.5
Some participation and significant input to group discussion
Poor
1.0
Very few and insignificant participation on discussion board
Subjects:
Computers
English
History
Science
Education
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.