iRubric: ESL oral competency rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ESL oral competency ESL oral competency a rubric designed to assess the speaking competency of an ESL student Rubric Code: QX5AXWA By hags65 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: (Other) Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

ESL Oral Competency
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Developing 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Participation in Oral Interaction	Poor Student does not participate	Fair Student is hesitant to participate but will do so if pressed	Developing Student participates with some hesitation when asked	Good Student participates without hesitation when asked	Excellent Student participates without being asked
Content of the message	Poor does not have appropriate vocabulary to participate	Fair has some appropriate vocabulary but not enough to speak on the topic	Developing has appropriate vocabulary to talk about known topics and satisfies social demands	Good has appropriate vocabulary to talk about multiple topics and shares opinion if encouraged	Excellent appropriate vocabulary, willingly shares opinion, able to talk on various topics
Articulation of the message	Poor cannot be understood	Fair understands some of the conversation, but range is limited	Developing understands most of the conversation, and can engage in discourse though messages still contain errors, and language is not complex	Good understands the conversation, and is able to speak with accuracy and can be understood, and uses some complex language	Excellent understands conversation, is able to speak with accuracy, is understood well, and uses more complex language
Use of repair strategies	Poor is unable to use any strategies	Fair needs help and encouragement to clarify meaning	Developing uses strategies when guided such as gesturing to compensate for unknown words	Good uses strategies with minimal guidance	Excellent uses strategies to express ideas, can check understanding with very little guidance
Fillers (ah, um, err etc)	Poor An excessive use of fillers (6+) per turn which distracted from the listener's comprehension and speaker's fluency	Fair Student had 4-6 fillers during the turns in the discussion	Developing Student had a few fillers (3-5) during turns	Good Minimal number of filler used (1-3)that caused minimal distraction to the listener during turns	Excellent Student had no recourse to fillers or pauses which distracted from the listener's attention
Discourse markers	Poor no evidence of us of discourse markers	Fair some limited attempts at discourse markers, which tend to be over generalized	Developing uses a moderate number of discourse markers at appropriate times	Good uses a variety of discourse markers for back channeling, opening and closing, turn taking, interrupting	Excellent uses a wide range of discourse markers appropriately and accurately