iRubric: Art Criticism Cube rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Art Criticism Cube Art Criticism Cube Assesses student understanding and application of art criticism principles through the production of an art criticism cube. Rubric Code: QCCC5A By androparche Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Art criticism cube
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Moderate 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Description	Excellent Makes a complete and detailed description of the subject matter and/or elements and principles of design seen in the artwork.	Good Makes a detailed description of most of the subject matter and/or elements and principles of design seen in the artwork	Moderate Makes a detailed description of some of the subject matter and/or elements and principles of design seen in the artwork.	Poor Descriptions are not detailed or complete
Analysis	Excellent Accurately describes several dominant elements or principles used by the artist and accurately relates how they are used by the artist to reinforce the theme, meaning, mood, or feeling of the artwork	Good Accurately describes a couple of dominant elements or principles used by the artist and accurately relates how they are used by the artist to reinforce the theme, meaning, mood, or feeling of the artwork.	Moderate Describes some dominant elements and principles used by the artist, but has difficulty describing how these relate tot he meaning or feeling of the artwork.	Poor Has trouble picking out the dominant elements
Interpretation	Excellent Forms a reasonable hypothesis about the symbolic or metaphorical meaning of the artwork and is able to support this with evidence from the artwork. Explains why the artist made the choices he/she did	Good Student identifies the literal meaning of the artwork. Gives a partial interpretation of symbolic meaning with some evidence from the artwork.	Moderate Student can relate how the work makes him/her feel personally. Does not give evidence from artwork, does not talk about the symbolic meaning of the artwork	Poor Student finds it difficult to interpret any meaning in the work.
Judgement	Excellent Uses multiple criteria to judge the artwork, such as composition, creativity, design, communication of ideas, successfulness of the image. Talks about what the artist was trying to communicate and gives clear reasons	Good Uses 1-2 criteria to judge the artwork. Tells whether the artwork is successful or not and talks about what the artist was trying to communicate but could be clearer	Moderate Tries to use aesthetic criteria to judge artwork, but does not apply the criteria accurately. Does not explain whether or not the artwork is successful.	Poor Evaluates work as good or bad based on personal taste. Doesn't comment on what the artist was trying to communicate. Does not explain whether or not the artwork is successful.