Skip to main content

iRubric: Semester FINAL Project: French 3 (Board) Game rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Semester FINAL Project: French 3 (Board) Game Semester FINAL Project: French 3 (Board) Game You will create a French board game that covers what we've done this term including GRAMMAR, VOCABULARY, CULTURE, & OTHER categories. It must include at least 35 questions and answers in French that range from easy to complex, and you MUST be able to answer them all for your game. ALL games are due on our final exam block February 26th at 8:30am. Do your 35 q/a FIRST and show them to me. Get creative with the rest and have fun! Rubric Code: QC4A49 By erikcj Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Academic Content / Presentation
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 7 pts	Good 8.5 pts	Super 10 pts
35 Questions?Answers? - Rough Draft	Poor 3 or more of these: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging.	Fair A fair selection of questions, but with 2 of the following: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging. Game cards made for each question.	Good Good overall and covers material from all units, but with 1 of the following: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging. Game cards are made for each question.	Super On time, thorough, relevant, good range of difficulty, show attention to detail, evenly distributed from all units this winter. Game cards made for each question.
Accuracy of Content	Poor Several information cards made for the game are not accurate.	Fair All but 7 of the information cards made for the game are correct.	Good All but 4 of the information cards made for the game are correct.	Super All information cards made for the game are correct.
Instructional Effectiveness	Poor The content is incidental. One can play without learning much.	Fair Significant cognitive effort is spent on things that have nothing to do with the content.	Good Winning and learning are closely entwined, though some mental effort is spent on aspects that are just about the game.	Super Winning the game requires learning the content. The two are matched completely.
Presentation of Game	Poor Did not participate much in presenting of game or did not say much or just spoke in English	Fair Participated some in presentation of game. Perhaps some English and some French. Knew game.	Good Good knowledge of game and able to explain to class. Used French mostly.	Super Very active in the presentation of the game, knew the game inside and out and able to explain clearly and exclusively in French
Use of French	Poor Almost none.	Fair Some.	Good Most of the board, rules, etc. presented in French	Super Title, Board, rules, etc. all presented in correct French
Participation (within group, ranked	Poor Almost none.	Fair Limited; made no effort to increase knowledge to help out.	Good Made some effort but still left others with brunt of work.	Super Participated fully and found ways to build on knowledge through process.
The Game Itself
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 7 pts	Good 8.5 pts	Super 10 pts
Rules	Poor Unwritten.	Fair Rules were written, but some difficulty figuring out the game.	Good Rules were written, but one part of the game needed slightly more explanation.	Super Rules were written completely and clearly enough so that all could easily participate. All in French.
Attractiveness	Poor Little or no color, fewer than 3 graphics.	Fair Contrasting color and 1 original graphic.	Good Contrasting color and at least 3 original graphics.	Super Many Contrasting colors and at least 5 original graphics.
Creativity	Poor Little thought was put into making the game interesting and fun.	Fair The group tried to make the game interesting and fun, but some parts of it were hard to understand/enjoy.	Good The group put some thought into making the game intersting and fun to play by using textures, fancy writing, game pieces and /or interesting characters and board.	Super The group put a lot of thought into making the game fun and interesting to play as shown by creative questions, game pieces, and/or game board.
Theme	Poor Little evidence showing the game had a theme.	Fair A theme was somewhat evident.	Good A theme was evident.	Super A clear theme was chosen from those we studied this term and the theme was abundantly clear in all aspects of the game.

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Foreign Languages rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202