Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Written Artifacts rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Written Artifacts
Journal Entry Notebook
Teachers are to use binders, notebooks and portfolios to support student learning on a consistent basis with a variety of consistent feedback.
Rubric Code:
QBA4B7
By
tdickerson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5, 6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Written Artifacts
Excellent
3 pts
Good
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Organized
Excellent
Ideas are consistently organized logically and clearly in a meaningful manner across all sampled artifacts. Teacher has provided students with written directions for completion.
Good
Ideas are inconsistently organized across sampled artifacts. Teacher has provided students with written directions for completion.
Poor
Ideas are so inconsistent as to show little to no trace of organization acorss artifacts. Teacher may or may not have provided students with written directions for completion.
Student Understanding
Excellent
Responses consistently show detailed understanding of curriculum focus and all sampled students have detailed examples written in a variety of ways (words, pictures, numbers, charts, graphs, etc.). Examples also show student extention of learning through additional notes/examples/summaries or interaction with material.
Good
Responses show understanding of curriculum focus but student written examples aren't varied or show individual interaction with material.
Poor
Responses inconsistently show understanding of curriculum focus; few, if any individual interaction with material.
Consistent Use
Excellent
It is clearly evident that written artifacts are consistently utilized and are an intregal component of the daily curriculum focus.
Good
It is evident that written artifacts are utilized, but there are some inconsistencies across sampled artifacts.
Poor
There is no clear evidence that written artifacts are consistently used. Samples show spotty date patterns and lack of consistency with curriculum focus.
Feedback
Excellent
It is clearly evident that teacher provides a variety of consistent feedback to students including, but not limited to grades, checks, peer review, or self assessments. It is also evident that student made corrections/changes based on feedback.
Good
It is evident that teacher provides feedback on a consist basis. Some variation of feedback may exist.
Poor
Little to no consistent feedback is provided.
Keywords:
Math journal entry
Subjects:
English
Health
Types:
Project
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.