iRubric: MUSB 125 Group Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
MUSB 125 Group Presentation Rubric MUSB 125 Group Presentation Rubric This rubric is designed to assess the presentation of the group presentation. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions. Rubric Code: QA658A By jtreinish Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Group Presentation Rubric
	Excellent 100 pts	Good 80 pts	Fair 70 pts	Poor 60 pts
Organization	Excellent Presentation was very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly.	Good Presentation was fairly organized and pretty followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away greatly from the overall presentation.	Fair Presentation was not clearly organized. Transitions between members were jumpy or awkward.	Poor Presentation lacked organization. Poor transitions between group members individual parts. Presentation lacked order and very difficult to follow.
Teamwork/Participation	Excellent The group worked very well with each other and the presentation was shared equally among the group members.	Good The group worked well with each other and communicated well. Some members participated slightly more than others.	Fair Group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.	Poor Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation.
Content	Excellent Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.	Good Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.	Fair Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.	Poor Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.
Integration of Technology	Excellent Technology was used effectively throughout presentation. The group showed creativity through choice of selected media/technology. Group members used technology as a meaningful supplement.	Good Technology was used effectively throughout presentation. The group showed creativity through choice of selected media/technology.	Fair Technology used did not support verbal presentation.	Poor Technology was not used at all.