Skip to main content

iRubric: Portfolio Economic Analysis Section - Fall 2012 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Portfolio Economic Analysis Section - Fall 2012 
Economic Analysis
This is the rubric for grading the Economic Analysis section of the Student Portfolios in the Integrated Projects Curriculum of Messiah College Engineering Department. (v1.0, created 10/11 by TW, v2.0, revised 03/12 by DG, v 2.1 revised 09/12 by TV)
Rubric Code: Q9W3W3
By mcengin
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Reflection
33.33 %
  Exemplary/Excellent

5 pts

Accomplished/Good

4 pts

Developing/Fair

3 pts

Deficient/Poor

2 pts

Not Applicable

(N/A)

Setting / Context
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

References the project assignment and its relationship to the project goals, as well as the date of completion, timeliness of sub-mission, and co-workers.
Accomplished/Good

References the project assignment, date of completion, and co-workers involved.
Developing/Fair

References only the project assignment that lead to the portfolio entry.
Deficient/Poor

Does not describe the relationship of the portfolio entry with the overall project.
Not Applicable
Appearance
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Properly formatted word-processed document on “resume-quality” paper.
Accomplished/Good

Properly formatted word-processed document.
Developing/Fair

Neatly handwritten or unformatted type.
Deficient/Poor

Illegible or sloppy.
Not Applicable
Writing Mechanics
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Writing is free of grammatical and spelling errors.
Accomplished/Good

Writing is mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors.
Developing/Fair

Grammatical and spelling errors are present but do not detract from the reflection.
Deficient/Poor

Grammatical and spelling errors detract from the reflection. The FYS professor picks up the red pen to correct them…
Not Applicable
Reflection
2 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Summary, mastery of the category, and personal growth represented by the entry.
Accomplished/Good

Summary of the student’s contribution and an explanation of how the entry demonstrates the mastery of the category.
Developing/Fair

Pure summary of the student’s contribution to entry.
Deficient/Poor

Rambling gibberish. It appears the writer is trying to fill in empty space.
Not Applicable
Entry
66.67 %
  Exemplary/Excellent

5 pts

Accomplished/Good

4 pts

Developing/Fair

3 pts

Deficient/Poor

2 pts

Not Applicable

(N/A)

Assumptions
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Clearly states and justifies all assumptions appropriate for the analysis.
Accomplished/Good

States the assumptions used for the analysis. Most are justified and appropriate.
Developing/Fair

States most of the assumptions necessary for analysis, but does not justify these assumptions. Some assumptions are redundant or unnecessary
Deficient/Poor

Most necessary assumptions are not present and/or justified. Several assumptions are inappropriate for the analysis.
Not Applicable

Not Applicable
Cost Estimation
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

All estimates have a legitimate source and/or a reasoned derivation.
Accomplished/Good

Most estimates have a reasoned derivation. Only the “big ticket” items have source information.
Developing/Fair

Some items have a reasoned derivation, but there is little or no documentation of sources.
Deficient/Poor

Most values are “pulled out the air”, without derivation or documentation.
Not Applicable

Not Applicable
Methods
2 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Correct calculations using a “time value of money” technique and analysis of the uncertainty of the result.
Accomplished/Good

Correct calculations using a “time value of money” technique.
Developing/Fair

Correct calculations, but analysis does not reflect the “time value of money.”
Deficient/Poor

Incorrect calculations
Not Applicable

Not Applicable
Conclusions
1 pts

Exemplary/Excellent

Correctly interprets the results of the analysis, including the range of answers caused by varying estimates or assumptions.
Accomplished/Good

Correctly interprets the results of the analysis, and recognizes that different estimates or assumptions may change the result.
Developing/Fair

Correctly interprets the results of the analysis, but does not consider how variation of estimates changing assumptions may affect the result.
Deficient/Poor

Improperly interprets the results of the analysis.
Not Applicable

Not Applicable




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178