Skip to main content

iRubric: Effective Argumentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Effective Argumentation 
Argumentative Writing Rubric - Mr. Smith
Rubric Code: Q9352W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric ELA 9 - Mr. Smith
  Underdeveloped

1 pts

Developing

2 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Well-Developed

4 pts

Thesis / Claim

Underdeveloped

Claim is vague; no stand is taken on an issue.
Developing

Claim is vague; may be more fact than opinion.
Proficient

Claim is clear and expresses and opinion on a hot-button topic. A strong stand is taken and defended throughout the paper.
Well-Developed

Claim is clear and expresses an opinion on a hot-button topic of political importance.
A strong, specific stand is taken and defended consistently throughout the paper.
Counterclaim

Underdeveloped

Opposing point of view is absent from argument.
Developing

Opposing point of view is misrepresented OR not effectively refuted.
Proficient

One opposing point of view is clearly presented and effectively refuted with evidence and analysis.
Well-Developed

More than one opposing point of view is clearly presented and effectively refuted with evidence and analysis.
Evidence

Underdeveloped

Support for claim/counterclaim is lacking.
Developing

Support for claim/counterclaim is superficial.
Proficient

Support for claim/counterclaim is sufficient
Well-Developed

Support for claim/counterclaim is thorough.
Organization

Underdeveloped

Overall argument lacks structure.
Developing

Claim may be unclear in the introduction of the argument. Key points may be presented in a confusing or illogical sequence.
Proficient

Claim appears in introduction, body presents several key points related to overall argument, and concluding paragraph follows from and supports the argument presented.
Well-Developed

Claim appears in introduction, each body paragraph focuses on one key point related to the overall argument, and concluding paragraph follows from and supports the argument presented.
Language Use / Conventions

Underdeveloped

Argument is composed in primarily casual language inappropriate for a formal written argument. Frequent errors in conventions.
Developing

Argument attempts a formal style and objective tone in parts, but frequently lapses into more casual language inappropriate for a formal written argument. Frequent errors in conventions.
Proficient

Argument maintains a formal style and objective tone with few exceptions. Conventions of Academic English are followed, though some errors may be present.
Well-Developed

Argument maintains a formal style and objective tone consistently throughout. Conventions of Academic English are followed with few errors.
Presentation

Underdeveloped

Piece is untyped. It may also be sloppily presented.
Developing

Piece is untyped. It may be sloppily presented and formatting may be incorrect.
Proficient

Piece is typed. It may be sloppily presented and formatting may be incorrect.
Well-Developed

Piece is typed, Times New Roman font, size 12, double spaced. It is basically neat and has your name.



Keywords:
  • Argument

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202