Skip to main content
iRubric: Global Warming / Ozone Depletion Presentation Rubric

iRubric: Global Warming / Ozone Depletion Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Global Warming / Ozone Depletion Presentation Rubric 
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your atmospheric change presentation project. This rubric will used to score your presentation. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when composing the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the presentation, to ensure that all criteria have been met.
Rubric Code: Q83552
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Grading Rubric
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Content - Describe Problem

The potential causes of atmospheric change will be discussed.

Also, the atmospheric change will be described from the standpoint of what types of problems it is likely to cause. (Counts twice!)

Excellent

The presentation clearly and thoroughly describes the problem by identifying (4 or more) causes (including both human and natural.) The presentation identifies and discusses (4 or more) likely consequences.
Good

The presentation adequately describes the potential problem by identifying (3) causes (including both human and natural.) Discussion of the potential consequences identifies (3) likely consequences.
Fair

The presentation lacks a clear description of the potential problem by identifying (2) causes. The paper identifies (2) perceived consequences. Discussion is limited regarding the consequences.
Poor

The presentation provides an insufficient description of the problem - by identifying (1) or none of the causes. The paper identifies (1) or fewer consequences.
There is little or no discussion of the likely long-term consequences.
Content - Historical Evidence

All sources of historical evidence will be accurately summarized and interpreted.

Excellent

A thorough historical perspective regarding the atmospheric change is presented. The interpretation of the evidence is accurate and stated in a clear and coherent manner.
Good

A historical perspective regarding the atmospheric change is presented. The interpretation of the historical evidence is largely accurate.
Fair

There is little discussion of the historical evidence regarding the atmospheric change.

The presentation may contain factual errors regarding the interpretation of the historical data.
Poor

There is little or no discussion of the historical evidence regarding the atmospheric change.

The presentation contains factual errors regarding the interpretation of the historical data.
Content - Modern Evidence

Recent data will be described with a particular emphasis on global data.

Excellent

Includes (3 or more) examples of recent evidence in the discussion.

The interpretation of the evidence is accurate and stated in a clear and coherent manner.
Good

Includes (2) examples of the recent evidence in the discussion.

The interpretation of the evidence is largely accurate.
Fair

Includes (1) example of the recent evidence.

The presentation may contain factual errors regarding the interpretation of data.
Poor

Does not provide an example or provides inaccurate information about recent evidence.

The presentation contains factual errors regarding the interpretation of data.
Course of Action - Next Steps

A suggested course of action is proposed to minimize the impact of the atmospheric change.

Excellent

Includes (3 or more) options that would minimize the impact of the atmospheric change. The proposed options are scientifically and politically sound.
Good

Includes (2) options that would minimize the impact of the atmospheric change. The proposed options are largely scientifically and politically sound.
Fair

Includes (1) option that would minimize the impact of the atmospheric change. The proposed option is either scientifically or politically sound.
Poor

Does not provide an option that would minimize the atmospheric change.
Conclusion - INDIVIDUAL

You will submit a written statement regarding how you believe the U.S. should address the atmospheric change. EACH group member must submit separate, INDIVIDUAL conclusions. (Counts twice!)

Excellent

Speaker is well informed and elaborates beyond the displayed material.
Good

Speaker is well informed and elaborates a bit beyond the material displayed.
Fair

Speaker brings little knowledge to the presentation beyond what is displayed
Poor

Speaker simply reads the material displayed.
Voice/Speaking Skills

You will present your position/argument to your instructor and your classmates using effective presentation skills.

Excellent

Speaker presents in a loud and clear voice and does not read.

Stands up straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
Good

Speaker presents in a loud and clear voice - may use note card (no larger than 4X6.)

Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
Fair

Speaker presents in a voice that is sometimes clear, but simply reads from the presentation.

Sometimes stands up straight and establishes eye contact.
Poor

Speaker does not present in a loud or clear voice and reads simply from the presentation.

Slouches and/or does not look at people during the presentation.
Proper Citation

Whatever your argument, you will cite appropriate supporting data from your sources. Any information taken from any source material needs to be properly cited (MLA format) and included in your bibliography.

Excellent

All appropriate source material is correctly cited using the MLA format -includes a bibliography (Works Cited page.)
Good

Sources are cited inconsistently. The formatting of cited literature is largely correct and consistent. Not all of the sources cited were actually used.
(use MLA format)
Fair

Sources are cited inconsistently or not at all. There is either incorrect or no clear formatting of the source material.
(use MLA format)
Poor

Sources are not cited. There is either incorrect or no clear formatting of the source material (use MLA format.)
Time Management

You use your class time effectively during the preparation of your project AND your presentation follows time guidelines.

Excellent

Consistently used class time effectively with no off-task behavior. Presentation meets the 2 minutes per group member or 8 minutes for group time requirement.
Good

Mostly used class time effectively with very little off-task behavior. Presentation meets the 2 minutes per group member or 8 minutes for group time requirement.
Fair

Mostly used class time effectively with some off-task behavior. Presentation does not meet the 2 minutes per group member or 8 minutes for group time requirement.
Poor

Did not use class time effectively with frequent off-task behavior. Presentation does not meet the 2 minutes per group member or 8 minutes for group time requirement.



Keywords:
  • PowerPoint Presentation Rubric







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178