iRubric: Project Outcomes Document - Spring 2013 rubric

Date, Project Title, Client Information & Team members all included accurately.

Almost all of the requested information included accurately.

Most of the requested information included or all of the information included with some errors.

Some important information missing and/or some significant errors.

Phase matches that of PMD for time period. Uses proper status indicators, valid pointers & reflects project status accurately by completing the right boxes and leaving the right ones blank.

Phase matches that of PMD for time period. Uses mostly proper status indicators and/or mostly valid pointers and/or reflects project status with only a few errors.

Phase matches that of PMD for time period. Some status indicator and/or pointers missing and/or in the wrong place. Some errors in the way the project status is reported.

POD tabular status does not match that of PMD and/or wrong status indicators and/or missing pointers and/or design record files and/or project status is reported with serious inadequacies.

Fully explains what was done in an organized, logical & coherent way. Easy to read & understand. Accurate. Original. Builds effectively on & clearly references previous work.

Mostly explains what was done in an organized, logical and coherent way. Readable and understandable. Mostly accurate with only a few errors.

Explanation somewhat organized, logical and coherent and/or somewhat hard to read or understand and/or some inaccuracies.

Incomplete explanation and/or disorganized and/or illogical and/or incoherent and/or unreadable sections and/or parts impossible to understand and/or glaring inaccuracies.

Fully explains any conclusions with clear rationale, citing all relevant data, measurements and/or calculations. Describes systematic process of decision making; includes array of alternatives considered.

Explains conclusions with mostly clear rationale, citing some relevant data, measurements and/or calculations. Describes process of decision making; includes alternatives considered.

Explains some conclusions and/or some rationale. Cites some relevant data, measurements and/or calculations. Describes some decision making; includes at least one alternative.

Conclusions not fully explained and/or lack sufficient rationale or support. Relevant data, measurements and/or calculations missing. Decision making faulty or does not include alternatives.

Includes any Phase X specific report as required, or if not, explains rationale for its exclusion. Excellent in quality.

Includes any Phase X specific report as required, or if not, explains rationale for its exclusion. Good quality.

Includes any Phase X specific report as required, or if not, explains rationale for its exclusion. Fair quality.

Includes wrong Phase X specific report, or if missing does not explain its exclusion effectively or poor in quality.

All Design Records and/or External Sources located, easy to find, easy to read, understandable, well- documented, properly formatted and credited.

Most Design Records and/or External Sources located, readable, understandable, properly formatted and credited.

Some Design Records and/or External Sources missing or hard to locate, some hard to read or understand and/or some improperly formatted or credited.

Many Design Records and/or External Sources missing and/or hard to locate, read or understand and/or unformatted or uncredited.

Data tables formatted correctly with headings; proper use of units and significant figures

Some data tables with no headings, quantities with no units or wrong significant figures

Many data tables with no headings, quantities with no units or wrong significant figures

Disorganized data with no headings, quantities with wrong or no units, figures misleading