Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Science Learning Center Rubric II
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Science Learning Center Rubric II
Learning Station Rubric
Used to assess how well students participate, engage one another, meet the objectives and accomplish the tasks set at a self-directed learning center
Rubric Code:
Q5XA47
By
jacquiejlb
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Learning Center Rubric
Excellent
4 pts
Well done
3 pts
Minimal
2 pts
Improvement Needed
0 pts
Group Engagement
Excellent
-Partners work together to complete the Tasks as instructed.
-Partners interact well with each other without arguing.
Well done
-Partners work together to complete the Tasks with minimal arguing and evidence of compromise.
Minimal
-Partners work together, but tend to argue instead of discussing their differences with little evidence of compromise.
Improvement Needed
-Partners do not work together and argue without compromising.
Participation
Excellent
-Student works hard to complete all tasks in the time given.
Well done
-Student completes almost all tasks during class time.
Minimal
-Student does minimal work, or rushes to complete quickly without regard to quality.
-Student displays off-task behavior.
Improvement Needed
-Student refuses to work.
-Student allows partner to work without giving input.
-Student displays off-task behavior multiple times.
Task Completion
Excellent
-All Learning Center Tasks (Partner and Individual) are complete. Work is high quality, and completed as instructed
Well done
-Most Learning Center tasks are completed correctly, as instructed by the teacher.
Minimal
-Learning Center work is acceptable quality, but varies greatly from instructions given by the teacher.
Improvement Needed
-Individual work is incomplete.
Science Journal
Excellent
Directions were followed - 5 layers are clearly explained in journal responses. Work is neatly done with no more than 2 spelling/grammar errors.
Well done
Directions were followed - 4 layers are clearly explained in journal responses. Work is neatly done with no more than 3 spelling/grammar errors.
Minimal
Directions were not closely followed - 2 or 3 layers are somewhat explained in journal responses. Work is not neatly done and/or has more than 4 spelling/ grammar errors.
Improvement Needed
Directions were not followed and no clear layering was evident in journal responses. Work is not neatly done and includes many spelling/grammar errors.
Keywords:
learning center, science, language arts
Subjects:
English
Math
Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Exam
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.