Skip to main content
iRubric: English 103 Research Paper rubric

iRubric: English 103 Research Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
English 103 Research Paper 
Rubric for research papers completed by English 103--Composition & Critical Thinking
Rubric Code: Q48CBW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

10 pts

Good Job

9 pts

OK

8 pts

Need for Review

7 pts

Not Passing

Fail to meet basic standards

6 pts

Format
10 pts

Outline, Intro, Body, Conclusion, Works Cited

Excellent

This paper contains all of the following, in the correct order and in the correct format:
Outline, 8-10 page paper, Works Cited
Good Job

This paper contains all of the following, in the correct order, but maybe one or two are not in the correct format: Outline, 8-10 page paper, Works Cited
OK

This paper contains all of the following, maybe not in the correct order, or maybe one or two are not in the correct format: Outline, 8-10 page paper, Works Cited
Need for Review

This paper contains most of the following, maybe not in the correct order, or maybe one or two are not in the correct format: Outline, barely 8 pages, Works Cited
Not Passing

This paper is missing one or more of the following, maybe not in the correct order, or maybe one or two are not in the correct format: Outline, short 8 pages, Works Cited
Citations
10 pts

Correct uses of in-text and works cited page

Excellent

This paper contains the minimum five in-text citations with the correct format. Only sources from school database or library are used--no Wikipedia sources. The works cited page is also included in the correct MLA format.
Good Job

This paper contains the minimum five in-text citations with the correct format more times than not. Only sources from school database or library are used--no Wikipedia sources. The works cited page is also included in the correct MLA format.
OK

This paper contains the minimum five in-text citations with the correct format more times than not. Mostly sources from school database or library are used--maybe one Wikipedia source.The works cited page is also included in the correct MLA format, maybe with an error or two.
Need for Review

This paper maybe missing one or more of the five in-text citations with the correct format most of the time. Not enough sources from school database and library--Wikipedia sources are used. The works cited page is also included in the correct MLA format but may contain errors.
Not Passing

This paper maybe missing one or more of the five in-text citations with the correct format most of the time. No sources from school database and library--Wikipedia sources are used instead. The works cited page is missing or is not in correct MLA format.
Grammar/Mechanics
10 pts

Correct use of grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, etc.

Excellent

This paper demonstrates a proficiency in basic English skills and time taken out to proofread carefully before submission. There should be no more than 6 grammar/mechanical errors
Good Job

This paper demonstrates a proficiency in basic English skills and some time taken out to proofread carefull before submission. There should be no more than 8 grammar/mechanical errors
OK

This paper demonstrates a need for review of basic English skills and a lack of proofreading.There should be no more than 10 grammar/mechanical errors
Need for Review

This paper demonstrates a need for review of basic English skills and no proofreading. There should be no more than 12 grammar/mechanical errors
Not Passing

This paper demonstrates a need for review of basic English skills and no proofreading. There should be no more than 12
grammar/mechanical errors
Development
10 pts

Clearly stated thesis. Addresses chosen topic

Excellent

This paper has a clearly stated thesis in the introduction and body paragraphs which illustrate the supporting ideas of the chosen topic. There is also a demonstration of the ability to integrate quotes and other borrowed material, showing the connection between the ideas of the student and expert source.
Good Job

This paper has an adequate thesis statement and body paragraphs which do a fairly good job of illustrating the supporting ideas of the chosen topic. There is also a demonstration of the ability to integrate quotes and other borrowed material well enough to show the connection between the ideas of the student and expert source.
OK

This paper does not have an adequate thesis statement and body paragraphs do not illustrate the supporting ideas of the chosen topic well enough. Quotes and other borrowed mateial seem to be placed in the paper showing no connection between the ideas of the student and expert source.
Need for Review

This paper does not have an adequate thesis statement and maybe missing body paragraphs to illustrate the supporting ideas of the chosen topic.
Quotes and other borrowed material seem to be placed in the paper showing no connection between the ideas of the student and expert source.
Not Passing

This paper does not have a thesis statement and is missing body paragraphs that illustrate the supporting ideas of the chosen topic.
Clearly paraphrased, summarized and quoted material is not cited nor integrated correctly into the paper.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232