Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Clinical Trial Simulation Video rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Clinical Trial Simulation Video
Pamphlet, Group Presentation, and Participation Rubric
Students will videotape a simulation of a clinical trial, create an informed consent form and analyze the findings of the simulation.
Rubric Code:
Q3C8A6
By
kquinlisk
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Clinical Trial Simulation
Exceeds
10 pts
Good
9 pts
Fair
8 pts
Poor
6 pts
Informed Consent Form
Exceeds
-The informed consent form includes all information relevant to the topic in an organized fashion:
Purpose of study, risks to the individual, benefits, confidentiality protection, compensation plan, contact information, and the participants’ rights during the study.
Good
-Informed consent form includes all relevant information; however, it is not well-organized:
Purpose of study, risks to the individual, benefits, confidentiality protection, compensation plan, contact information, and the participants’ rights during the study.
Fair
-Does not have all of the relevant information of the informed consent form. Information is presented in an unorganized fashion: Purpose of study, risks to the individual, benefits, confidentiality protection, compensation plan, contact information, and the participants’ rights during the study.
Poor
-The informed consent form is lacking in elements required. There are many gaps in information presented. Missing many of these components: Purpose of study, risks to the individual, benefits, confidentiality protection, compensation plan, contact information, and the participants’ rights during the study.
Clinical Trial Results
Exceeds
The written conclusion of the findings from the study is logical, clear and detailed.
Good
The written conclusion of the findings from the study is mostly logical, clear, but missing detail.
Fair
The written conclusion of the findings from the study is scattered, incorrect, or vague.
Poor
The written conclusion of the findings is lacking in all three aspects of organization, detail, and exactness.
Clinical Trial Video
Exceeds
The participants speak clearly and effectively. They efficiently shared information. It is evident that the student prepared what will be said.
Good
The participants speak clearly and presents a good amount of the information expected.
Fair
There are several confusing moments and the information presented is not completely shared during the presentation. The student has not practiced what is to be said.
Poor
No preparation was done for the presentation and the information that is presented lacks many elements of what is expected.
Research
Exceeds
Student researched selected topic and answered focus questions. Information is relevant and detailed.
Good
Student researched selected topic question and answered most of the focus questions. Information is somewhat detailed and relevant.
Fair
Student performed research, but on more than 1 topic. Did not clearly answer the focus questions. Information is scattered, unorganized, and is vague.
Poor
Student did not research a selected topic. Did not answer focus questions. Information lacks detail, organization, and does not provide any valuable information for group.
Effort
Exceeds
Individual student displayed effort above and beyond expectations.
Good
Individual student displayed effort that met the criteria for this project.
Fair
Individual student displayed some effort throughout this project.
Poor
Individual student was lacking in effort throughout this project.
Keywords:
Purpose of study, risks to the individual, benefits, confidentiality protection, compensation plan, contact information, and the participants’ rights during the study.
Subjects:
Geology
Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Geology rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.