iRubric: AH225 Scheduled Homework III rubric

Contains many spelling and/or grammatical errors and is not formatted according to the guidelines

Contains some spelling and/or grammatical errors and is only partially formatted according to the guidelines

Contains a few spelling and/or grammatical errors and is formatted according to most of the guidelines

Contains one or two spelling and/or grammatical errors. Formatted according to guidelines.

Free of spelling and grammatical errors; formatted according to guidelines.

No variation is pointed out and/or no attitudes are reported.

Variation is pointed out where it does not exist, or variation which is obvious from the data is not noted. Alternatively, the data is unclear such that the presence of variation cannot be determined.

Variation explicitly pointed out in the report (or attitudes to variables pointed out). Correlation is not hypothesized.

Variation explicitly pointed out in the report (or attitudes to variables pointed out). Correlation is hypothesized between linguistic variation and social variables (or between attitudes to variation and social variables). The student does not make explicit reference to material in the textbook(s) in supporting the hypothesis.

Variation explicitly pointed out in the report (or attitudes to variables pointed out). Correlation is hypothesized between linguistic variation and social variables (or between attitudes to variation and social variables). Explicit reference to material in the textbook(s) is used in supporting the hypothesis.

Report includes no clear response to the question or provides only a yes/no answer.

Report includes a clear statement responding to the question: "Can you identify cases in which code-switching is part of an attempt to ‘establish, cross or destroy boundaries’, as Gal suggests?"" The response is not a yes/no answer; however, the response does not incorporate specific examples from the data, although it may refer to specific extracts from the textbook(s) or another source.

Report includes a clear statement responding to the question: "Can you identify cases in which code-switching is part of an attempt to ‘establish, cross or destroy boundaries’, as Gal suggests?"" The response is not a yes/no answer; it incorporates specific examples from the data collected by the student and relates these examples to knowledge from the course, thought without any reference to specific extracts from the textbook(s) or another source.

Report includes a clear statement responding to the question: "Can you identify cases in which code-switching is part of an attempt to ‘establish, cross or destroy boundaries’, as Gal suggests?"" The response is not a yes/no answer; it incorporates specific examples from the data collected by the student and relates these examples to knowledge from the course, as indicated through specific reference to one or more extracts from the textbook(s) or other scholarly sources.

Report includes a clear statement responding to the question: "Can you identify cases in which code-switching is part of an attempt to ‘establish, cross or destroy boundaries’, as Gal suggests?"" The response is not a yes/no answer; it incorporates specific examples from the data collected by the student and relates these examples to knowledge from the course, as indicated through specific reference to one or more extracts from the textbook(s) or other scholarly sources.