Skip to main content

iRubric: Case Study Paper/Evidence-Based Research rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Case Study Paper/Evidence-Based Research 
Evidence-Based Paper/Case Study Research Paper
Rubric Code: Q326A2
By CaJones34
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric EBP /Case Study Paper
  Poor

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Excellent

(N/A)

Brief Definition of Dev. Disability
10 %

Uses references from journals and/or book (No Internet Web Pages)
Poor

Provides very minimal information.
1-2 references only.
Fair

Provides some information about medical/psychologicalconditions. However leaves room for questions. Ex. Does not include variations or level of severity, prognosis, complications, and precautions.
Good

Provides most of the information about medical/psychologicalconditions. Includes problems frequently associated with the medical condition.

APA used at least 75% of the time
Excellent

Explains medical/psychologicalconditions clearly & detailed. Includes new information. For maximum points all references and paper (100%) need to be APA style.
Role of School Psychologist
20 %

Evidence based practice literature MUST be included
Poor

Provides very minimal information. No evidence based references included. Evidence-Based Practice provided. However poorly or not integrated in the paper
Fair

Provides some information about the role of the practitioner. Includes possible adjunctive, enabling, and purposeful activities. Minimal evidence-based practice provided (1-2 references), but effort to integrate information in the paper is recognizable.
Good

Explains the role of the SP practitionr. Evidence-based practice research included. However, either not completely integrated in the paper, or presented in a separate section.
Excellent

Explains in detailed role of the SP practitioner. Evidence practice research included and correctly integrated in the paper.
Case Study
20 %

Description of client in case study.
Problem list and strengths need to be included.
Poor

Client is described briefly.
Fair

A clear picture of the client is presented. However, some elements of context and/or environment are not included.
Problem list and/or strengths is incomplete.
Good

All elements of client's context and environment are addressed. Good physical/psychological/medical problem list and patient's strengths is presented. However, impact on the family or psychosocial issues have been omitted.
Excellent

Comprehensive analysis of patients strengths with family issues included.
Treatment goals
20 %

Write between 3-5 treatment goals that are specific and measurable.
Poor

One or more goals are missing.
More than 50 % of the goals are lacking. Goals are not measurable.
Fair

10-49% of the goals are not measurable or specific enough.
Good

1-9 % of the goals are not measurable or specific.
Excellent

All goals are clear, well written and meaningful for the client.
Treatment Implementation
20 %

Design a treatment implementation plan for your client/student. This treatment plan must include the duration of treatment, the location of the treatment, who will implement the treatment, and what materials are needed for the treatment plan.
Poor

No clear beginning, middle, and end to the treatment. Treatment areas out of the scope of practice. Treatment goals are rarely addressed.
Fair

Clear beginning, middle, and end of treatment. Activities correspond to treatment goals. Inconsistent support and analysis of activities/treatment utilized.
Good

Beginning, middle, and end to treatment session well defined as well as plan for evaluation of success/failure. Activities are described in detail and address treatment goals.
Excellent

Resources are used.
One Utilizes pictures, diagrams, etc. to illustrate treatment. Treatment plan is detailed but succient, and addresses the treatment goals. An evaluation plan is designed to determine if treatment should be terminated, should continue, or be modified.
Overall paper organization
10 %

Organization of content.
Includes grammar and spelling.
Poor

Information scattered and disorganized. Grammar and spelling so poor, sections of paper are impossible to understand.

PAPER WILL BE RETURNED.
Fair

Information is orderly, but difficult to follow or information is frequently repeated. Grammar and spelling errors present, but paper is understandable
Good

Good format. Easy to follow and understand.
Less than 3 grammar or spelling errors.
Excellent

Excellent format, use of correct terminology. Concise and professional.
Less than 3 minor spelling errors.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202