Skip to main content
iRubric: Fahrenheit 451 Characterization Rubric

iRubric: Fahrenheit 451 Characterization Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Fahrenheit 451 Characterization Rubric 
Direct and Indirect Characterization Rubric
Students analyze the characterization of one particular character from Fahrenheit 451. Fill in 1-5 on the graphic organizer following all directions.
Rubric Code: Q2WA959
By AnthonyThomason
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Fahrenheit 451 Characterization Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Great

4 pts

Direct Characterization

Poor

Little or no examples given demonstrate direct characterization of the subject. Student provided little or no citation (page numbers) for what examples are present.
Fair

Few examples given demonstrate direct characterization of the subject. Student provided citations (page numbers) for a few of the examples present.
Good

Most examples given demonstrate direct characterization of the subject. Student provided citations (page numbers) for most examples are present.
Great

All examples given demonstrate direct characterization of the subject. Student provided citations (page numbers) for all examples present.
Indirect Characterization

Poor

Little or no examples given demonstrate indirect characterization of the subject. Student provided little or no citation (page numbers) for what examples are present.
Fair

Few examples given demonstrate indirect characterization of the subject. Student provided citations (page numbers) for a few of the examples present.
Good

Most examples given demonstrate indirect characterization of the subject. Student provided citations (page numbers) for most examples are present.
Great

All examples given demonstrate indirect characterization of the subject. Student provided citations (page numbers) for all examples present.
Character Role

Poor

There is no analysis. Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear. Questions were not adequately answered
Fair

There is analysis, but it doesn't go beyond a brief comment. Content is not comprehensive. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Good

There is good analysis. Content is accurate. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Great

There is good analysis. It is consistent, and digs into the language of the author's intentions. There is thematic unity among all of the responses. Content is comprehensive and clear. Meaningful thought/effort put into answering personalized questions.
Flat vs. Round

Poor

There is no analysis. Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear. Questions were not adequately answered
Fair

There is analysis, but it doesn't go beyond a brief comment. Content is not comprehensive. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Good

There is good analysis. Content is accurate. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Great

There is good analysis. It is consistent, and digs into the language of the author's intentions. There is thematic unity among all of the responses. Content is comprehensive and clear. Meaningful thought/effort put into answering personalized questions.
Static vs. Dynamic

Poor

There is no analysis. Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear. Questions were not adequately answered
Fair

There is analysis, but it doesn't go beyond a brief comment. Content is not comprehensive. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Good

There is good analysis. Content is accurate. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Great

There is good analysis. It is consistent, and digs into the language of the author's intentions. There is thematic unity among all of the responses. Content is comprehensive and clear. Meaningful thought/effort put into answering personalized questions.



Keywords:
  • Fahrenheit 451

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232