Skip to main content
iRubric: Honors Research Paper rubric

iRubric: Honors Research Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Honors Research Paper 
Rubric Code: Q2B48A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
100 % Worth 100 points Total
  Weak

(N/A)

Developing

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Excellent

(N/A)

Quality of research
15 pts

Sources
Research

Weak

--4 or fewer sources
--Source reliablility questionable. Omitted information interferes with ability of reader to find the source.
--Little information relevant to thesis.
--Insufficient information provided to support thesis.
--Minimal research.
Developing

--Failed to cite at least 5 sources
--Source reliablility questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of thesis.
--Surface research.
Good

--Cited 5 sources
--Sources mostly reliable.
--Most information relevant to thesis.
--Sufficient information provided to support most elements of thesis.
--Research of sufficent depth.
Excellent

--Cited 5 reliable sources from print and electr.
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of thesis.
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Content
50 pts

Thesis & Support
Organization
Transition
Introduction
Conclusion

Weak

--Thesis unclear or non-existent.
--support for thesis insufficient, no embedded quotes
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion weak/non-existent.
Developing

--Thesis poorly stated.
--Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or.
some embedded quotes
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Good

--Thesis stated clearly.
--Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
all embedded quotes
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Excellent

--Thesis clear, interesting.
--Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject.
all embedded quotes
--Clear, appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Works Cited
10 pts

Sources
Citations

Weak

-- Sources not properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Many errors in format or punctuation.
--OR no works cited page
Developing

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and works cited page.
-- Multiple errors in format or punctuation.
Good

--All sources properly cited in both paper and works cited page.
-- Few errors in format or punctuation.
Excellent

--All sources properly cited in both paper and Works Cited page.
-- Almost zero or no errors in format or punctuation.
GUMSS
15 pts

Style
Spelling & punctuation
Mechanics & grammar
Sentence Structure

Weak

-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.
-- Ineffective word choice.
--Spelling errors.
--Many errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
Sentence structure is not varied; awk; rambling sent, runons and fragments
-- Many errors in punctuation or capitalization errors.
Developing

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--Few spelling errors.
--Few errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
Sentence structure is basic; could be more concise; awk; may contain errors
-- Few punctuation or capitalization errors.
Good

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
Sentence structure is solid; no errors; few awk; concise
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Excellent

--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
well developed sentence structure; no awk or errors; concise
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Formatting
5 pts

MLA Style Header
MLA Style Title
Page Numbering
Times New Roman 12 pt font
1" margins

Weak

--Format does not meet criteria.
--Many errors
Developing

--Format does not completely meet criteria.
--Few errors.
Good

--Format appropriate to meet criteria.
--No more than 2 errors
Excellent

--Format appropriate to meet criteria.
--No errors



Keywords:
  • Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202