Skip to main content

iRubric: Screenprinting Course Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Screenprinting Course Rubric 
This includes the criteria for evaluation of this course. I am giving everyone full credit for the physical portfolio since we were unable to see them together.
Rubric Code: Q24W62X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Course Performance
This is a tool to evaluate the course requirements for this class.
  Excellent

Performance is excellent and shows exemplary growth and effort.

100 pts

Good

Performance is very good and shows significant growth.

85 pts

Fair

Performance accomplishes the basic requirements of the course.

75 pts

Poor

Performance is below the basic requirements of the course.

65 pts

Printmaking Technique
20 %

Technical Mastery of Medium

Excellent

Significant achievement in gaining mastery of the printing process. Strived to advance understanding of the process by time and effort that is demonstrated in print. Advanced growth and understanding of the properties of paper, color, and proofing. Takes risks and goes beyond basic assignment expectations.
Good

Techniques improved significantly. Show a growing understanding of color properties and potentials of layering color, registration, editioning and proofing. Growing understanding of the properties of paper, color, and proofing.
Fair

Techniques have remained level. Progress in print quality is generally acceptable but some uneven treatment of color, registration, and exploring proofing is developing but could be stronger, more even, and further explored.
Poor

Techniques are problematic: messy, careless, uneven, and underdeveloped prints. Editioning is limited and proofing is rarely used to adjust color, registration. Paper handling-careless.
Physical Portfolio
15 %

Quality of presentation of editions and proofs

Excellent

Prints are fully editioned, are organized, curated and signed properly for presentation. Proofs are also included that show experimentation to advance the final portfolio. Glassine paper is interleaved between prints. A portfolio supports the body of work for safe storage.
Good

Prints are fully editioned and organized, signed and curated. Proofs are provided that demonstrate efforts for adjustment to edition. Glassine is interleaved between prints and a portfolio supports the body of work.
Fair

Prints are editioned, signed, and curated. Proofs are provided but are not distinguishable from the edition. Glassine is interleaved between prints and a portfolio is provided.
Poor

Prints are editioned are inconsistent or sometimes fall short of a full edition. No proofing is attempted to develop a strong edition. Materials other than glassine are interleaved between prints.
Class Culture/Contributions
25 %

Timeliness of work for critiques and care and respect of studio

Excellent

Is in class and is always prepared to work, or to present work for discussion/critiques. Contributes thoughtfully and attentively to critiques. Treats studio--screens, sinks, other people's property with respect for others and quality of work environment. Helps others when necessary.
Good

Is in class and prepared to work or present work for discussion/critiques. Contributes to critiques. Treats studio and other people's property with respect and care.
Fair

Usually prepared for class, but has fallen behind at times. Sometimes contributes to critiques/discussions but if sometimes unprepared or distracted from class discussion. Generally careful in studio and takes care of own work.
Poor

Is not prepared for class discussion and critiques of work. Often distracted during class discussion, critiques, treatment of the studio and/or other people's work.
Digital Portfolio
25 %

Quality documentation of artwork.

Excellent

High resolution quality images are presented and on time for review.
Examples of proofs are provided when relevant. Writing/reflection provides insights into influences, artists, and problems and processes are presented verbally and in writing.
Good

Generally quality images are presented on time for review. Examples of proofs are provided. Writing is provided on each piece that gives insights into work.
Fair

Images are generally acceptable but could reflect the pieces more effectively--color is off, edges are not well attended to.
Poor

Images are badly presented and could reflect the pieces more effectively--color is off, edges are not well attended to, and the portfolio is not uploaded by the final deadline.
Artistic Exploration
15 %

Thought and risk taking with the medium

Excellent

Challenges the medium by exploring assignments with engaged exploration of thought, ideas, materials, and historical inquiry of medium and personal vision. Articulates these through the piece as well as language.
Good

Explores the medium and advances your understanding of the potentials of it for personal and artistic exploration throughout the prints.
Fair

Maintains an ongoing concept that keeps you exploring the medium. Begins to articulate as to how your ideas are either brought to or taken from the printing process.
Poor

Little connection to the historical or personal content that engages exploration of the medium. Risk taking and responsibility of medium & content is weak



Keywords:
  • Fine Arts







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n52