Skip to main content

iRubric: ENG1:Rhetorical Analysis MIDTERM rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
ENG1:Rhetorical Analysis MIDTERM 
AP Essay Rubric - Rhetorical Analysis
Rubric Code: PXXA4WC
By ksorise
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Rhetorical Analysis MIDTERM
  Little Success (1-2)

(N/A)

Inadequate (3-4)

(N/A)

Inconsistent/Limited (5)

(N/A)

Adequate (6-7)

(N/A)

Effective (8-10)

(N/A)

Addresses all the tasks-- 10 points

Little Success (1-2)

These essays demonstrate minimal understanding of the topic or the passage.
Inadequate (3-4)

These essays are weaker than the 5 score because the writer overlooks or perhaps misreads important ideas in the passage.
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Essays that earn a medium score complete the essay task, but with no special insights; the analysis lacks depth and merely states the obvious. Frequently, the ideas are predictable and the paragraph development weak. Although the writing conveys the writer's ideas, they are presented simplistically and often contain lapses in diction or syntax.
Adequate (6-7)

Medium-scoring essays complete the tasks of the essay topic well - they show some insight but usually with less precision and clarity than high-scoring essays. Writer is able to identify the author's motivation, focus, purpose and audience.
Effective (8-10)

High-scoring essays thoroughly address all the tasks of the essay prompt in well-organized responses. Overall, high-scoring essays present thoroughly developed, intelligent ideas; sound and logical organization; strong evidence; and articulate diction. Writer is able to identify the author's motivation, focus, purpose and audience effectively and discuss the author's intention logically and with depth.
Writing--10 points

Little Success (1-2)

Perhaps unfinished, these essays offer no analysis of the passage and little or no evidence for the student's ideas. Incorrect assertions may be made about the passage.
Inadequate (3-4)

The student may summarize the passage's ideas instead of analyzing them.
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Although the writing conveys the writer's ideas, they are presented simplistically and often contain lapses in diction or syntax.
Adequate (6-7)

There may be lapses in correct diction or sophisticated language, but the essay is generally well written.
Effective (8-10)

The writing demonstrates stylistic sophistication and control over the elements of effective writing, although it is not necessarily faultless.
Conventions--10 points

Little Success (1-2)

Stylistically, these essays may show consistent grammatical problems, and sentence structure is usually simple and unimaginative.
Inadequate (3-4)

Although the writer's ideas are generally understandable, the control of language is often immature.
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Although the writing conveys the writer's ideas, they are presented simplistically and often contain lapses in diction or syntax.
Adequate (6-7)

Presents thoroughly developed, intelligent ideas; sound and logical organization; strong evidence; and articulate diction. Very few grammatical errors.
Effective (8-10)

Overall, high-scoring essays present thoroughly developed, intelligent ideas; sound and logical organization; strong evidence; and articulate diction. Virtually no grammatical errors.
Rhetorical Analysis--20 points

Little Success (1-2)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate little ability to identify or analyze rhetorical strategies. Sometimes these essays misread the prompt and replace it with easier tasks, such as paraphrasing the passage or listing some strategies the author uses.
Inadequate (3-4)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate little discussion of rhetorical strategies or incorrect identification and/or analysis of those strategies.
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate uneven or insufficient understanding of how rhetorical strategies create an author's point. Often, the writer merely lists what he or she observes in the passage instead of analyzing effect.
Adequate (6-7)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate sufficient examination of the author's point and the rhetorical strategies used to enhance the central idea. Writer can adequately analyze the author's motivation, focus, purpose and audience effectively.
Effective (8-10)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate significant understanding of the passage, its intent, and the rhetorical strategies the author employs. Writer can effectively analyze the author's motivation, focus, purpose and audience thoroughly as well as analyze the author's intention logically and with depth.
MLA citations--10 points

Little Success (1-2)

Does not use MLA in-text citations
Inadequate (3-4)

Attempts to use MLA in-text citations
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Uses MLA in-text citations with inconsistency
Adequate (6-7)

Uses MLA in-text citations with adequacy
Effective (8-10)

Uses MLA in-text citations correctly and effectively.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202