iRubric: Digital Video Final Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Digital Video Final Project Rubric Code: PXC5C5X By mbbrad4d Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Group overall
	Poor 6 pts	Fair 9 pts	Good 12 pts	Excellent 15 pts
quality	Poor project uses little or no proper photography or editing; many shooting and editing mistakes	Fair project uses some proper and appropriate photography and editing for the project; several mistakes in shooting or editing	Good project mostly uses proper and appropriate photography and editing for the project; a few mistakes in shooting or editing	Excellent project uses proper and appropriate photography and editing for the project; no mistakes in shooting or editing
Project complexity
	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
creativity/complexity	Poor project is very simple; easily done in one class period with no effort or creativity	Fair project uses basic or simple ideas; shooting or editing involves little creativity or effort	Good project uses some creative ideas in shooting and editing	Excellent project uses highly creative ideas in shooting and editing
PSA
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
elements	Poor includes none of the required elements; PSA is missing	Fair includes one out of three elements	Good includes two out of three elements	Excellent includes relevant facts, an appeal and a call to action
quantity of contribution
	Poor 10 pts	Fair 18 pts	Good 21 pts	Excellent 25 pts
individual quantity	Poor contributed little to nothing to overall project; frequently absent or missing from shoots PLEASE NOTE, THIS GRADE COULD BE LOWER THAN 10 DEPENDING ON YOUR EFFORT	Fair contributed somewhat to overall project; missed one or two classes or shoots	Good somewhat active contributor to project; worked significantly on one element or equally on several elements	Excellent Key leader in project; strong contributor to most elements of project
individual quality
	poor 10 pts	fair 18 pts	good 21 pts	excellent 25 pts
quality--indiv	poor student uses little or no proper photography or editing; many shooting and editing mistakes	fair student uses some proper and appropriate photography and editing for the project; several mistakes in shooting or editing	good student mostly uses proper and appropriate photography and editing for the project; a few mistakes in shooting or editing	excellent student uses proper and appropriate photography and editing for the project; no mistakes in shooting or editing
Peer Review
	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
peer review	Poor short summary of peers in group with no reflection on communication PLEASE NOTE, THIS CAN BE A ZERO IF NOT RECEIVED ON TIME.	Fair generalized description of peers in group; little reflection on group communication	Good somewhat detailed in description about peers; light consideration of communication among group	Excellent includes much detail about peers and interactions; considers and reflects on communication among group
Production schedule
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
detail	Poor schedule was hidden or incomplete	Fair partial listing of shoots, edit sessions, crew and goals; little evidence of who completed what work and when	Good shows a somewhat complete list of shoots, edit sessions, crew and goals; some evidence of how work was completed	Excellent shows a complete, detailed list of all shoots, editing sessions, crews and goals; evidence of all work that was completed
updated	Poor schedule was not updated after initial date	Fair schedule was updated once or twice--or at the last minute	Good schedule was updated once a week throughout production process	Excellent schedule was updated every few days throughout production process

Subjects:

Communication

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric