Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Design Your Own Restaurant Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Design Your Own Restaurant Project
Design Your Own Restaurant Project
Students will have a budget that will be used design and launch the opening of a restaurant.
Rubric Code:
PX7CC8C
By
raeanlane
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Math
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5, 6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Restaurant Design Project
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Restaurant Name, Concept, and Theme
Poor
Name was not mentioned or no particular concept or theme was present
Fair
Concept or theme was not developed in detail
Good
Theme was apparent in name and logo but not in design and attributes of the menu
Excellent
Concept and theme was well represented with a creative name, innovative design and specific menu choices were shown
Menu Selection
Poor
Menu options were limited, did not support restaurant's concept or theme, descriptions of menu items were not provided
Fair
Many choices were made available but many did not support the restaurant concept or theme, descriptions were limited or incomplete and lacked sensory details
Good
Menu options were varied and complete, some dishes related to restaurant concept and theme, most dishes were described in sensory detail
Excellent
A variety of menu items were specifically chosen to support the restaurant concept and theme, every dish was described using sensory details
Advertisement
Poor
Less than the required amount (4) of print advertisements were provided, essential information (name of restaurant, logo, contact information) was missing
Fair
Advertisements were provided but were lacking either name of restaurant, logo, or other essential information
Good
Advertisements were neatly presented, colorful, and included necessary features of restaurant name, logo, and contact information (phone number, website, address)
Excellent
All advertisements were of high quality, colorful, informative, inclusive of necessary information, and showed creativity and innovation
Restaurant Design
Poor
Blueprint and/or design lacked detail and did not include necessary equipment (kitchen, bathrooms, tables or booths, etc.)
Fair
Blueprint and design were complete and included necessary equipment but lacked detail (furnishings, accessories, labels)
Good
All aspects of blueprint and design were complete, details were included, attention to audience was evident
Excellent
Blueprint and design were thorough, complete, colorful, and visually stimulating, attention to audience was evident
Math Calculations
Poor
Checks, profit sheet, and/or check register were not included
Fair
Checks, profit sheet, and check register were included but calculations were incorrect
Good
Checks, profit sheets, and check register were included, all calculations were correct
Excellent
Checks, profit sheets, and check register were included, all calculations were correct, additional calculations were included to show evidence of math used
Commercial
Poor
Commercial was not provided or lacked creativity and necessary information (name, address, hours of operation, specialty, etc.)
Fair
Commercial lacked creativity, some, but not all, essential information was included
Good
Commercial was creative and included use of a slogan or jingle, all essential information was included, recognition of audience was implied but not evident
Excellent
Commercial was artistic, creative, innovative, and original; commercial was visually stimulating with effective use of jingle or slogan, recognition of audience was evident
Group Collaboration and Effort
Poor
Group members did not collaborate, group members did not equally share responsibilities, deadlines were not met
Fair
Collaboration was evident, responsibilities were shared, but time was not used effectively and some deadlines were not met
Good
Group collaborated well, responsibiltes were shared equally, most deadlines were met
Excellent
Group showed effective use of collaboration and communication, all members contributed, all deadlines were met
Use of Technology
Poor
No technology was used in the final presentation
Fair
Minimal technology was used throughout the project and in the final presentation
Good
Technology was used throughout the project and was incorporated into the final product
Excellent
Varied use of technology throughout the project is evident, technology is an integral part of the final product
Subjects:
Arts and Design
English
Math
Social Sciences
Vocational
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.