Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: AP Physics 1 Lab Report Rubric - Springs and things
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
AP Physics 1 Lab Report Rubric - Springs and things
AP Physics 2 Lab Report Rubric - Flowing Fluid
Physics Lab Report Rubric
Rubric Code:
PX774C9
By
izifundo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Physics
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Physics Lab Report Rubric
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Poor
(N/A)
Title (1 mark)
Excellent
The title is present and prominently displayed on the top of the page. The title should be specific to the lab and relate to the subject, key variables and method.
Good
All but one of the components is included.
Fair
A few components of the title page are missing.
Poor
No title page is included (zero points)
Introduction - Purpose (2 marks)
Excellent
Report states the purpose of the lab clearly and completely.
Good
Report states purpose of the lab clearly with only minor errors or omissions.
Fair
Report states purpose but it is unclear and/or has major errors or omissions
Poor
No purpose or objective is included.
Introduction - Theory (4 marks)
Excellent
Includes a thorough discussion of theory and equations needed to understand the lab.
Good
Includes a discussion of the necessary theory and equations, with only minor errors.
Fair
Theory is discussed but is unclear and/or has major errors or omissions.
Poor
No theory is discussed.
Methods - Materials (5 marks)
Excellent
All materials are listed and apparatus is clearly sketched, drawn or described.
Good
Minor errors and/or omissions
Fair
Major errors and/or omissions
Poor
No material list or apparatus sketch is included.
Methods - Procedures (5 marks)
Excellent
Procedure has enough detail that it could be easily duplicated by another researcher that is not present.
Good
Procedure has only minor errors and/or omissions.
Fair
Improper format (i.e. no list format and/or no paraphrasing) and/or major errors or omissions.
Poor
No procedure is included.
Results - Data Tables and Graphs (5
Excellent
Data is presented in professional looking table or chart. Table or chart is accurate and complete, and labeled with appropriate units and titles.
Good
Minor errors or omissions
Fair
Data is presented accurately but in improper format (i.e. in written form but no tables or charts) and/or major errors or omissions
Poor
Data is not presented accurately or is missing and demonstrating minimal effort.
Results - Calculations (4 marks)
Excellent
All calculations for one complete trial are clearly and correctly shown and the results labeled with the appropriate units.
Good
Minor error and/or omissions.
Fair
Very few of required calculations are shown. Calculations reflect major errors or omissions
Poor
Calculations are missing completely, demonstrating minimal effort.
Discussion - Analysis (19 marks)
Excellent
Discussion is detailed and includes the relationship between trends/patterns seen, a thorough discussion of the data, and analysis of graphs. Lab questions are answered correctly, thoroughly and clearly.
Good
Somewhat detailed and/or minor errors or omissions.
Fair
Brief and/or major errors or omissions Overall, section is not very thoroughly done.
Poor
Analysis questions responses are missing completely, demonstrating minimal effort.
Discussion - Conclusion (2 marks)
Excellent
Clear and concise conclusions are given. Conclusion addresses problem/objective and states knowledge gained.
Errors are identified and thoroughly discussed.
Good
Conclusions are present and complete, knowledge gained in present, discussion of errors present, but is not clear and precise. Minor errors and/or omissions
Fair
Conclusion is missing parts and/or knowledge gained. Conclusion has major errors or omissions.
Poor
Conclusion is missing completely, demonstrating minimal effort.
Spelling, grammar, etc. (3 marks)
Excellent
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.Proper "voice" is used and no use of pronouns.
Good
Some errors in rules of grammar, spelling and punctuation but errors doe not distract reader or impede communication.
Minor errors and/or omissions
Fair
Frequent errors in rules of grammar, spelling and punctuation; Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone; Language distracts reader and impedes communication.
Poor
Numerous errors in all areas of "excellent" category. Language severely impedes communication, demonstrating minimal effort.
Keywords:
Newton's third law, Hooke's law
Subjects:
Physics
Types:
Project
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Physics rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.