Skip to main content

iRubric: My Self-Reflection rubric

home

» rubrics » iRubric: My Self-Reflection rubric »

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
My Self-Reflection My Self-Reflection "When applied to oneself, reflection prompts self-evaluation. This practice engenders self-correction - the most effective route to improvement and growth." Dr. Marvin Marshall Rubric Code: PX34C26 By mvwatkins Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Assessment Grade Levels: K-5

Self-Rating
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Relationship Building with Students	Poor yells at students often appears to be uninterested in students publicly criticizes and berates students gets frustrated easily with students uses lots of sarcasm, cynicism and other forms of negative language often appears to be in a bad mood	Fair sometimes abrupt and impatient with students uses some sarcasm and negativity with students often uses threats of consequences to achieve desired behavior uses little humor *sometimes appears to be in a bad mood	Good often shows patience and calmness Rarely uses negativity consistently utilizes a systematic behavior plan makes effort to get to know the "whole child." *looks for student strengths	Excellent strives to be a model of calmness and patience creates an atmosphere of positivity and good humor uses a consistent behavior plan based upon student choices and internal motivation focuses on student strengths and ways to build upon them *routinely seeks awareness of the interests and life circumstances of all students
Lesson Planning and Preparedness	Poor routinely relies on "winging it." materials are almost never prepared beforehand lessons are usually not aligned with standards little effort is made to help make lessons interesting to students previous learning is not reflected in lessons embedded questions are generally uninspiring and usually are limited to DOK1 and 2	Fair often relies on "winging it." seldom has written plans available materials are often scattered and unorganized lessons are only sometimes aligned with standards but standards are unknown by teacher some lessons are interesting to students some connection to previous learning is reflected in lessons *some embedded questions are challenging to students but mostly stay at or below DOK3	Good often has written lesson plans available materials are prepared before lesson and are neatly organized *good effort is made to help make lessons interesting and relevant to students' lives	Excellent provides standards-based written lesson plans that are easily accessible Daily learning objectives are posted for all stakeholders to view neatly organized materials are prepared at least one day in advance students perceive most lessons as highly engaging *students are given opportunities to apply skills through PBLs (Project Based Learning)
Time Management and Productivity	Poor more than 50% of "free time" is consumed by Q1, Q3, and Q4 activities no organized system of time management is in use	Fair between 25% and 50% of "free time" is consumed by Q1, Q2, and Q4 activities has an organized system but activities are not prioritized	Good less than 25% of "free time" is consumed with Q1, Q2, and Q4 activities employs an organized system of prioritized activities	Excellent Q2 activities are considered a strong priority and most other activities are attended to only after Q2 is completed (Put First Things First) employs an organized system of prioritized activities which is aligned with personal values and are frequently reflected upon
Family Communication	Poor *rarely makes effort to communicate with parents	Fair *parent communication made but is generally based on negative contacts and is thus unproductive	Good *parent contact is routine and mostly positive and productive	Excellent *routine, positive, informative and productive communication is made and strong relationships with family members are nurtured
Peer Relations	Poor consistently uses negative, gossipy and/or inappropriate language routinely withdraws from the emotional bank accounts of others	Fair sometimes uses negative, gossipy and/or inappropriate language at times withdraws from the emotional bank accounts of others	Good routinely abstains from negative, gossipy and/or inappropriate language seeks to make deposits in the emotional bank account of others *shows responsibility by apologizing when mistakes are made	Excellent proactively seeks to promote a work atmosphere of positivity, kindness, effective problem solving and the empowerment of others through modeling and encouragement routinely practices "empathic listening"

Keywords:

Improvement and Growth

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Science rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n223