Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: LD Case Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
LD Case Rubric
LD Case Rubric
Rubric to grade LD Debate Cases for beginning Debate Class
Rubric Code:
PX2X246
By
biesuz
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
LD Debate Case
Enter rubric description
Poor
1 pts
Fair
5 pts
Good
9 pts
Introduction
Poor
No introduction
Fair
Introduction is minimal
Good
Introduction is well thought out complete
Resolution
Poor
Resolution is not given
Fair
Good
Resolution is given
Value
Poor
No Value is given
Fair
Value is given but there is not fully explained
Good
Value is given and fully explained
Value Criterion
Poor
No Value Criterion is given
Fair
Value Criterion is given but not fully explained or linked to value
Good
Value Criterion is given; it is fully explained and linked to value
Definitions
Poor
No definitions given
Fair
Definitions are given but no source is given for definitions or the source used for definitions is not credible
Good
Definitions are given from a credible source
Contentions
Poor
1 Contention
Fair
2 or 3 somewhat developed contentions
Good
2 or 3 fully contentions
Contentions
Poor
No Contentions
Fair
Contentions are somewhat developed, but are missing one or more elements: claim; warrant (evidence) and/or impact (why evidence proves claim or why it is important)
Good
Contentions are fully developed containing all three elements of a full argument: claim; warrant (evidence) and/or impact (why evidence proves claim or why it is important)
Sub Points
Poor
0 or 1 subpoint per contention
Fair
2 fully developed subpoints per contention
Good
3 fully developed subpoints per contention
Evidence
Poor
Evidence is not used.
Fair
Evidence is used, but sources are not given or are not credible
Good
Great evidence - credible sources
Analysis/Impact
Poor
Evidence, Contentions or Claims are not analyzed or impact is not given
Fair
There is an attempt to analyze evidence or show impact of evidence, but it is not fully analyzed.
Good
Analysis/Impacts of evidence is fully completed. No doubt in reader or judges mind as to the importance of evidence.
Ask for the Vote
Poor
Does not ask for the aff or neg vote
Fair
Good
Asks for the aff or neg vote
Subjects:
Communication
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.