Skip to main content

iRubric: Injury Assessment Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Injury Assessment Rubric Decision Making (Injury Assessment) worksheet This is a rubric to use to assist students in building skills as they relate to Athletic Training injury/illness assessment. Additionally, the purpose is to build students' ability to navigate an injury/illness assessment while also developing a strong different assessment rationale. Rubric Code: PX244X4 By jswill362 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Health Type: Assignment Grade Levels: 9-12

AREAS
	Consider Remediation 0 pts	Below Standards Student does not demonstrate complete competency within the specified area 1 pts	Meets Standard Student demonstrates competency in this area 2 pts	Exceeds Standard Student demonstrates an above average skill level and competency level 3 pts
History and Anatomy Overview 3 points	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Below Standards History is scant. The majority of vital information to the chief complaint is missing.<BR> One or more of the following are missing: MOI, location of pain, previous injury, systemic profile, weak integration of rationale for asking the questions	Meets Standard History is age and gender appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the chief complaint.<BR> Pertinent HX questions are noted but may not be complete/some pertinent information are missing. Integration of the information is satisfactory but not complete.	Exceeds Standard History is complete and age and gender appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained.<BR> There is complete list of pertinent Hx questions. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
Observation 3 points	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Below Standards Observation is scant. The majority of vital information to the observation is missing.<BR> One or more of the following are missing: postural evaluation, girth, limb length, local, regional etc.. Weak integration of rationale for the observation aspects.	Meets Standard Observation is situation appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the the condition.<BR> Pertinent areas of observation are noted but may not be complete/some pertinent information are missing. Integration of the information is satisfactory but not complete.	Exceeds Standard Observation is complete and condition appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained.<BR> There is complete list of pertinent observation structures etc. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
Palpation 3 pts	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Below Standards Appropriate physical examination is incomplete. The information obtained would not be sufficient to support the diagnosis. (EM & FP) The physical examination has not been completed as instructed. (DIRECTED for G/P, Surg, & WH. COMPREHENSIVE for IM and Peds)	Meets Standard Physical exam is appropriate for the chief complaint but there are pertinent systems or special tests missing. Physical examination is appropriate for chief complaint but not all other systems were examined.(Comprehensive IM and Peds Only)	Exceeds Standard Palpation is complete and condition appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained.<BR> There is complete list of pertinent palpation structures etc. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
ROM 3 pts.	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Below Standards ROM is scant. The majority of vital information to the ROM is missing.<BR> One or more of the following are missing: Active, Passive, Resistive, Con, Ecc, MMT, BT. Weak integration of rationale for the ROM aspects.	Meets Standard ROM is situation appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the the condition.<BR> Pertinent areas of ROM are noted but may not be complete/some pertinent information are missing. Integration of the information is satisfactory but not complete.	Exceeds Standard ROM is complete and condition appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained.<BR> There is complete list of ROM actions etc. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
Special Tests 3 pts	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Below Standards ST are scant. The majority of vital information to the condition is missing.<BR> One or more of the following are missing: Stress tests, labs, xray, MRI/CT. Weak integration of rationale for the ST aspects.	Meets Standard ST are situation appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the the condition.<BR> Pertinent areas of ST are noted but may not be complete/some pertinent information are missing. Integration of the information is satisfactory but not complete.	Exceeds Standard ST is complete and condition appropriate. It is written in logical format and strong rationale is given for the information attained.<BR> There is complete list of ST actions/results etc. There integration into the evaluation is well documented and articulated. A clear and deliberate retrospective is provided.
Diagnosis/Differential Dx.	Consider Remediation A "0" will be awarded when information is grossly void and no attempt at integration is identified.	Below Standards Inclusion of differential assessment is weak and little rationale is provided. Defining factors are weak and need to be more clearly identified. A retrospective is not articulated clearly or is omitted.	Meets Standard Appropriate differential conditions are included. Appropriate information to rule out the condition may be weak or need improvement. Defining factors and retrospective is provided but needs to be improved.	Exceeds Standard Diagnosis and Differential assessment is complete and appropriate. It is written in a logical format and strong rationale is given for the information. Defining factors are clearly and thoroughly shared as is the retrospective.
VI. Style 10 points	Consider Remediation Faculty may assign "0" points when work in the category is far below what is expected from a student in this program	Below Standards The paper does not relay adequate information on the subject, is disorganized and difficult to follow. <BR> <BR> The paper has numerous errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and pagination.<BR> <BR> *There is inappropriate use of medical terminology.	Meets Standard The paper relays information but is slightly disorganized. <BR> <BR> The content has several mistakes in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and/or pagination.<BR> <BR> *Medical terminology is used appropriately most of the time	Exceeds Standard The paper is well-written in a logical organized manner. <BR> <BR> The paper has appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation, and pagination.<BR> <BR> *There is consistent and appropriate use of medical terminology

Keywords:

Medical

Subjects:

Health

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Health rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202